Literature DB >> 26961192

Natural hydroxyapatite as a bone graft extender for posterolateral spine arthrodesis.

Christophe Garin1, Séverine Boutrand2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective analysis of spinal fusion, was to document the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes with a local bone graft plus the highly osteoconductive hydroxyapatite, bio-derived Orthoss®, with or without bone marrow aspirate.
METHODS: Forty seven patients submitted to spinal posterolateral fusion were operated for four major indications: scoliosis in young patients (11), degenerative spine (18), lumbosacral transitional anomalies in young adults (14), and spine trauma (four). Sixteen patients had more than four levels fused. In addition to spinal decompression and instrumented fusion, autologous bone grafts from the excised lamina were augmented with Orthoss® granules in a 1:1 ratio. In addition iliac crest bone marrow aspirate was used in 70 % of the patients. The results were assessed clinically in terms of pain, and return to school or professional activities were checked at three, six, and 12 months following surgery with a mean follow-up of 20 months. In scoliotic patients, correction of the major angle was evaluated from one to four years after surgery.
RESULTS: Pain persistence was reported only in four cases, after three months after surgery. A functional recovery was noted in almost all patients groups within these three months. Progressive bone formation with evidence of bone fusion masses were already observed at six months. No fusion failure was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Local bone enhanced by an osteoconductive long-term stable scaffold, used with and without bone marrow aspirate, led to successful fusion in all patients by six months while functional recovery was reported already within three to six months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone graft substitute; Bone marrow aspirate; Lumbar degenerative spine; Orthoss®; Scoliosis; Spinal posterolateral fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26961192     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3140-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

Review 1.  Challenges to bone formation in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jeremy J Reid; Jared S Johnson; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Outcome of local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Eeric Truumees; Chetan K Patel; Chris Kazmierczak; Brian Hughes; Greg Elders; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterolateral fusion using laminectomy bone chips in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Victor Ka-Siong Kho; Wen-Chih Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Alex Ching; Laura Matsen; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Heather Angier; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Bone graft volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study with a five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Spyridon Zacharatos; Zisis Papazisis; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A comparison of posterolateral lumbar fusion comparing autograft, autogenous laminectomy bone with bone marrow aspirate, and calcium sulphate with bone marrow aspirate: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Chi-Chien Niu; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Po-Liang Lai; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Frank J Eismont; Robert P Norton; Brandon P Hirsch
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; M S Nickoli; J C Wang; J R Lieberman; H S An; S T Yoon; J A Youssef; D S Brodke; C M McCullough
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-10-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  SPINAL SPECIAL EDITION EDITORIAL.

Authors:  Andrew Quaile
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.