Literature DB >> 26961172

Positive effects of aggressive vasodilator treatment of well-treated essential hypertensive patients.

M Engholm1,2,3, M J Mulvany1, A Eftekhari1,2, O N Mathiassen2, N H Buus4, K L Christensen2,5.   

Abstract

Increased systemic vascular resistance and coronary microvascular dysfunction are well-documented in essential hypertension (EH). We investigated the effect of additional vasodilating treatment on coronary and peripheral resistance circulation in EH patients with high systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) despite well-treated blood pressure (BP). We enroled patients on stable antihypertensive treatment that were given intensified vasodilating therapy (ACE inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker). Before and following 6 months of intensified therapy, coronary resting and maximal artery flow were measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to calculate coronary flow reserve (CFR) and minimum vascular resistance (C-Rmin). Cardiac output was estimated by inert gas rebreathing to calculate SVRI. Maximal forearm blood flow was determined by venous occlusion plethysmography to calculate minimum vascular resistance (F-Rmin). Patients were assigned into two groups: high-SVRI and low-SVRI subgroups, based on a median split at baseline. Following additional treatment SVRI decreased more in the high-SVRI group than in the low-SVRI group (14.4 vs -2.2%: P=0.003), despite similar baseline ambulatory BP (132/81 mm Hg) and BP reduction (6.5 and 4.6%: P=0.19). F-Rmin remained unchanged (6.5 vs -2.0%: P=0.30), while C-Rmin decreased by 22 and 24% (P=0.80) and CFR increased by 23 and 17% (P=0.16). Thus, intensified vasodilating therapy improved SVRI more in patients with high SVRI than in those with low SVRI. Regardless of SVRI status, the treatment improved cardiac but not forearm dilatation capacity. The substantial improvement of the hypertensive cardiac microvascular dysfunction was not related to the reduction in SVRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26961172     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2016.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  37 in total

1.  Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output during exercise by inert gas rebreathing technique: a new tool for heart failure evaluation.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Gaia Cattadori; Anna Apostolo; Mauro Contini; Pietro Palermo; Giancarlo Marenzi; Karlman Wasserman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Prognostic value of treadmill exercise testing: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  V L Roger; S J Jacobsen; P A Pellikka; T D Miller; K R Bailey; B J Gersh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Dissociation of blood pressure and resistance artery structure: potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Kent L Christensen; Niels H Buus
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.080

4.  Progressive improvement in the structure of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients after 2 years of treatment with an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor. Comparison with effects of a beta-blocker.

Authors:  E L Schiffrin; L Y Deng; P Larochelle
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 5.  Hemodynamic aspects of essential hypertension in humans.

Authors:  J Conway
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Effect of amlodipine compared to atenolol on small arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Ernesto L Schiffrin; Qian Pu; Jeong Bae Park
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  A positive family history of premature coronary artery disease is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow regulation.

Authors:  V Schächinger; M B Britten; M Elsner; D H Walter; I Scharrer; A M Zeiher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with chest pain syndrome and normal or near-normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Fausto Rigo; Lauro Cortigiani; Sonia Gherardi; Maurizio Galderisi; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Prognostic implications of coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Lauro Cortigiani; Fausto Rigo; Sonia Gherardi; Maurizio Galderisi; Rosa Sicari; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  The non-invasive documentation of coronary microcirculation impairment: role of transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Pawel Petkow Dimitrow; Maurizio Galderisi; Fausto Rigo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 2.062

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of ACE-inhibition on coronary microvascular function and symptoms in normotensive women with microvascular angina: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Mide Michelsen; Anna Bay Rask; Elena Suhrs; Kristoffer Flintholm Raft; Nis Høst; Eva Prescott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Hiroki Shimokawa; Colin Berry
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.081

3.  Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Jingwen Yong; Jinfan Tian; Xueyao Yang; Haoran Xing; Yi He; Xiantao Song
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.