U A Matulonis1, R T Penson2, S M Domchek3, B Kaufman4, R Shapira-Frommer4, M W Audeh5, S Kaye6, L R Molife6, K A Gelmon7, J D Robertson8, H Mann8, T W Ho9, R L Coleman10. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston ursula_matulonis@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 3. Department of Medicine, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA. 4. Division of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel. 5. Division of Medical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA. 6. Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. 8. Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK. 9. Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Wilmington. 10. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza™) demonstrates antitumor activity in women with relapsed ovarian cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Data from olaparib monotherapy trials were used to explore the treatment effect of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received multiple lines of prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis evaluated pooled data from two phase I trials [NCT00516373 (study 2); NCT00777582 (study 24)] and four phase II trials [NCT00494442 (study 9); NCT00628251 (study 12); NCT00679783 (study 20); NCT01078662 (study 42)] that recruited women with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer. All patients had a documented gBRCAm and were receiving olaparib 400 mg monotherapy twice daily (capsule formulation) at the time of relapse. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were evaluated using original patient outcomes data for patients with measurable disease at baseline. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients in the pooled population, 273 had measurable disease at baseline, of whom 205 (75%) had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy. In the pooled population, the ORR was 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30-42] and the median DoR was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.7-9.1). The ORR among patients who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy was 31% (95% CI 25-38), with a DoR of 7.8 months (95% CI 5.6-9.5). The safety profile of olaparib was similar in patients who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy compared with the pooled population; grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 54% and 50% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Durable responses to olaparib were observed in patients with relapsed gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00516373; NCT00494442; NCT00628251; NCT00679783; NCT00777582; NCT01078662.
BACKGROUND: The PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza™) demonstrates antitumor activity in women with relapsed ovarian cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Data from olaparib monotherapy trials were used to explore the treatment effect of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received multiple lines of prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis evaluated pooled data from two phase I trials [NCT00516373 (study 2); NCT00777582 (study 24)] and four phase II trials [NCT00494442 (study 9); NCT00628251 (study 12); NCT00679783 (study 20); NCT01078662 (study 42)] that recruited women with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer. All patients had a documented gBRCAm and were receiving olaparib 400 mg monotherapy twice daily (capsule formulation) at the time of relapse. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were evaluated using original patient outcomes data for patients with measurable disease at baseline. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients in the pooled population, 273 had measurable disease at baseline, of whom 205 (75%) had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy. In the pooled population, the ORR was 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30-42] and the median DoR was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.7-9.1). The ORR among patients who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy was 31% (95% CI 25-38), with a DoR of 7.8 months (95% CI 5.6-9.5). The safety profile of olaparib was similar in patients who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy compared with the pooled population; grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 54% and 50% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Durable responses to olaparib were observed in patients with relapsed gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00516373; NCT00494442; NCT00628251; NCT00679783; NCT00777582; NCT01078662.
Authors: Tatsuyuki Chiyoda; Peter C Hart; Mark A Eckert; Stephanie M McGregor; Ricardo R Lastra; Ryuji Hamamoto; Yusuke Nakamura; S Diane Yamada; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Ernst Lengyel; Iris L Romero Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2017-03-06
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Austin Miller; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Russell J Schilder; Joan L Walker; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Saketh R Guntupalli; Deborah K Armstrong; Andrea R Hagemann; Heidi J Gray; Linda R Duska; Cara A Mathews; Alice Chen; David O'Malley; Sarah Gordon; Paula M Fracasso; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; William T Barry; Michael Birrer; Shannon N Westin; Karen A Cadoo; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Erica L Mayer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert L Coleman; Bose Kochupurakkal; Christin Whalen; Jennifer Curtis; Sarah Farooq; Weixiu Luo; Julia Eismann; Mary K Buss; Carol Aghajanian; Gordon B Mills; Sangeetha Palakurthi; Paul Kirschmeier; Joyce Liu; Lewis C Cantley; Scott H Kaufmann; Elizabeth M Swisher; Alan D D'Andrea; Eric Winer; Gerburg M Wulf; Ursula A Matulonis Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Deyin Xing; Gang Zheng; John Kenneth Schoolmeester; Zaibo Li; Aparna Pallavajjala; Lisa Haley; Michael G Conner; Russell Vang; Chien-Fu Hung; Tzyy-Choou Wu; Brigitte M Ronnett Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 6.394