Literature DB >> 26961007

Refining a Web-based goal assessment interview: item reduction based on reliability and predictive validity.

Carolyn E Schwartz1,2, Jei Li3,4, Bruce D Rapkin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Goals are an important basis for patients' cognitive appraisal processes underlying quality-of-life (QOL) assessment because they are the foundation to one's frame of reference. We sought to identify the best of six goal delineation items and relevant themes for two new versions of the QOL Appraisal Profile: an interview tool using a subset of the best open-ended goal delineation items, and a shorter close-ended version for use in survey research.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data (n = 1126) of participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (MS) registry. The open-ended data were coded by at least two trained coders with moderately high inter-rater agreement. There were 31 themes reflecting goal content such as health, interpersonal, independence, mental health, and financial themes. Descriptive statistics identified most prevalent themes. Reliability analysis (alpha, item-total correlations) and hierarchical linear modeling identified the best goal items.
RESULTS: Based on these qualitative and quantitative analyses, Solve (item 2) is the best single item because it is clear anchor for about a third of the goal themes, and explains the most variance in outcomes and demographic characteristics, suggesting that it taps into and reveals diversity in the sample. The next best items are Accomplish and Maintain (items 1 and 4), which are useful in tapping into and revealing diversity among people reporting cognitive deficits (Accomplish), and demographic factors (both Accomplish and Maintain items).
CONCLUSIONS: The goal delineation items identified as best performers in this study will be used to develop a shorter open-ended version of the QOL Appraisal Profile, and an entirely close-ended version of the QOL Appraisal Profile for use in more standard survey research settings. These tools will enable coaching patients in medical decision making as well as investigations of appraisal and response shift in QOL research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appraisal; Goal assessment; Multiple sclerosis; Patient-reported outcomes; Response shift

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26961007     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1258-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  27 in total

1.  A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals.

Authors:  A J Elliot; V I Chirkov; Y Kim; K M Sheldon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Framing the construct of life satisfaction in terms of older adults' personal goals.

Authors:  B D Rapkin; K Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-03

3.  Goal attainment scaling and outcome measurement in postacute brain injury rehabilitation.

Authors:  J F Malec; J S Smigielski; R W DePompolo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Mobility Limitation and Changes in Personal Goals Among Older Women.

Authors:  Milla Saajanaho; Anne Viljanen; Sanna Read; Johanna Eronen; Jaakko Kaprio; Marja Jylhä; Taina Rantanen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Subjective well-being.

Authors:  E Diener
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: a mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin; Bruce A Rapkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Classification and regression tree uncovered hierarchy of psychosocial determinants underlying quality-of-life response shift in HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Yuelin Li; Bruce Rapkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Early intervention in planning end-of-life care with ambulatory geriatric patients: results of a pilot trial.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; H Brownell Wheeler; Bernard Hammes; Noreen Basque; Jean Edmunds; George Reed; Yunsheng Ma; Lynn Li; Patricia Tabloski; Julianne Yanko
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-22

9.  Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of impairment and disability for MS. North American Research Consortium on Multiple Sclerosis Outcomes Study Group.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; T Vollmer; H Lee
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Emerging multiple sclerosis oral therapies.

Authors:  Kottil W Rammohan; Jennifer Shoemaker
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Appraisal assessment in patient-reported outcome research: methods for uncovering the personal context and meaning of quality of life.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Joel A Finkelstein; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development of a practical outcome measure to account for individual differences in quality-of-life appraisal: the Brief Appraisal Inventory.

Authors:  Bruce D Rapkin; Iliana Garcia; Wesley Michael; Jie Zhang; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2.

Authors:  Bruce D Rapkin; Iliana Garcia; Wesley Michael; Jie Zhang; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Appraisal and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin; Jhase Sniderman; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-05

5.  Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Roland B Stark; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.