Literature DB >> 26960766

Land degradation due to erosion in public perception. Case study: Secaşul Mare river basin settlements (Transylvanian Depression, Romania).

Marioara Costea1, Ioan Tăuşan2.   

Abstract

According to the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR 1990-1999), the risk indicates potential losses due to particular natural phenomenon, and these could be reduced by improving of prevention and education. People perceive these losses differently depending on phenomenon occurrence, severity, and impact in time. Starting from this idea, this research presents public perception on land degradation through erosion in a small area from the central part of Romania (south-west of Transylvanian Depression). The research was based on a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions. The items were structured by issues: awareness assessment regarding hazard and risk phenomena, assessment of type of property and land use, assessment of knowledge and information on the possible production of negative effects by natural phenomena, and evaluation of land owners' attitudes towards the occurrence of erosion on their land. Results reveal that the public perception on erosion is weak. This process is perceived as insignificant due to lack of phenomenon knowledge and especially because of scarcity preoccupation in land's quality monitoring. Even though the owned lands are affected by erosion forms, the owners are not aware of the phenomenon that generates them. Material damages caused by erosion, loss of soil quality, and land fertility decrease are less perceived because the economic losses fill only at long term. This perception leads to underestimating erosion risk compared to other natural phenomena and to a passive attitude towards this particular phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erosion; Hazard/risk; Land degradation; Public perception; Romania

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26960766     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5200-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Analytical paradigms: the epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public.

Authors:  T Garvin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives.

Authors:  P E Gustafson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.

Authors:  J Flynn; P Slovic; C K Mertz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 4.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science.

Authors:  B L Turner; Roger E Kasperson; Pamela A Matson; James J McCarthy; Robert W Corell; Lindsey Christensen; Noelle Eckley; Jeanne X Kasperson; Amy Luers; Marybeth L Martello; Colin Polsky; Alexander Pulsipher; Andrew Schiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.