Literature DB >> 26960703

Evaluating the Obstetrical Implications of Antenatal Testing for Women with Morbid Obesity: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Increased Surveillance.

P Kaitlyn Edelson1, Jamie A Bastek1, Lisa D Levine1.   

Abstract

Objectives Despite limited data, antenatal testing has been initiated in many institutions for women with morbid obesity given their increased risk of stillbirth. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the obstetrical implications of antenatal testing in the morbidly obese population. Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing antenatal testing from January 2011 through December 2012 who delivered at our institution. The exposed group was women undergoing antenatal testing with morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m(2)). This group was subdivided into two groups: group 1, which included women undergoing testing for morbid obesity alone, and group 2, which included women undergoing testing for morbid obesity with an additional medical comorbidity. The unexposed group (group 3) comprised nonmorbidly obese women (BMI < 35 kg/m(2)) undergoing antenatal testing for similar medical comorbidities. Our primary outcomes were induction of labor and gestational age at delivery. Results A total of 512 women met inclusion criteria. Group 1 had a lower induction rate as compared with groups 2 and 3 (22.2, 32.5, and 37.6%, respectively; p = 0.003). Additionally, women delivered at a later gestational age in group 1 (39.3 weeks [38.4-40.2]) compared with groups 2 (38.5 weeks [36.1-40.3]) or 3 (37.1 weeks [37.0-38.2]), p = 0.04. There were no significant differences in our secondary outcomes including rate of cesarean delivery (p = 0.11) or rate of nonreactive nonstress test (p = 0.4). Conclusions While it remains unknown whether antenatal testing decreases the stillbirth risk in morbidly obese women, this population does not appear to be at increased risk of induction of labor or delivery prior to 39 weeks secondary to testing. Future studies should evaluate neonatal implications and cost-effectiveness of antenatal testing in this group. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26960703      PMCID: PMC4945474          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  13 in total

Review 1.  Fetal and perinatal consequences of maternal obesity.

Authors:  Chakrapani Vasudevan; Mary Renfrew; William McGuire
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  The impact of antenatal testing for advanced maternal age on cesarean delivery rate at an urban institution.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Sindhu K Srinivas; Emmanuel Paré; Shilpi S Mehta-Lee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Maternal obesity and nonstress testing.

Authors:  Steffen Brown; Michael D Wolfe; Rebecca Coalson; Orrin B Myers; William F Rayburn
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Management of obesity in pregnancy.

Authors:  Patrick M Catalano
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Susan Y Chu; Shin Y Kim; Joseph Lau; Christopher H Schmid; Patricia M Dietz; William M Callaghan; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Late preterm infants: near term but still in a critical developmental time period.

Authors:  Amir Kugelman; Andrew A Colin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The effectiveness of antepartum surveillance in reducing the risk of stillbirth in patients with advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Nathan S Fox; Andrei Rebarber; Michael Silverstein; Ashley S Roman; Chad K Klauser; Daniel H Saltzman
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Risks of pregnancy and birth in obese primiparous women: an analysis of German perinatal statistics.

Authors:  Volker Briese; Manfred Voigt; Josef Wisser; Ulrike Borchardt; Sebastian Straube
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.

Authors:  Anna Palatnik; Michelle A Kominiarek
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.