Literature DB >> 26959322

Radiation dose determines the method for quantification of DNA double strand breaks.

Tanja Bulat1, Otilija Keta1, Lela Korićanac1, Jelena Žakula1, Ivan Petrović1, Aleksandra Ristić-Fira1, Danijela Todorović2.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation induces DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) that trigger phosphorylation of the histone protein H2AX (γH2AX). Immunofluorescent staining visualizes formation of γH2AX foci, allowing their quantification. This method, as opposed to Western blot assay and Flow cytometry, provides more accurate analysis, by showing exact position and intensity of fluorescent signal in each single cell. In practice there are problems in quantification of γH2AX. This paper is based on two issues: the determination of which technique should be applied concerning the radiation dose, and how to analyze fluorescent microscopy images obtained by different microscopes. HTB140 melanoma cells were exposed to γ-rays, in the dose range from 1 to 16 Gy. Radiation effects on the DNA level were analyzed at different time intervals after irradiation by Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence microscopy. Immunochemically stained cells were visualized with two types of microscopes: AxioVision (Zeiss, Germany) microscope, comprising an ApoTome software, and AxioImagerA1 microscope (Zeiss, Germany). Obtained results show that the level of γH2AX is time and dose dependent. Immunofluorescence microscopy provided better detection of DSBs for lower irradiation doses, while Western blot analysis was more reliable for higher irradiation doses. AxioVision microscope containing ApoTome software was more suitable for the detection of γH2AX foci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26959322     DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201620140553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  An Acad Bras Cienc        ISSN: 0001-3765            Impact factor:   1.753


  6 in total

1.  Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sébastien Penninckx; Eloise Pariset; Egle Cekanaviciute; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-12-22

2.  Moderate Dose Irradiation Induces DNA Damage and Impairments of Barrier and Host Defense in Nasal Epithelial Cells in vitro.

Authors:  Yue-Ying Yang; Jing Liu; Yi-Tong Liu; Hsiao-Hui Ong; Qian-Min Chen; Ce-Belle Chen; Mark Thong; Xinni Xu; Sui-Zi Zhou; Qian-Hui Qiu; De-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-06-25

3.  Radiosensitization of Clioquinol Combined with Zinc in the Nasopharyngeal Cancer Stem-like Cells by Inhibiting Autophagy in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Yuan Ke; Chaoyan Wu; Yifei Zeng; Mengge Chen; Yonghong Li; Conghua Xie; Yunfeng Zhou; Yahua Zhong; Haijun Yu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.580

4.  The immunohistochemical and histologic effects of contrast medium on uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries, given during hysterosalpingography: rat study

Authors:  Eren Pek; Ceren Canbey Göret; Servet Hacıvelioğlu; Gürhan Adam; Mesut Abdülkerim Ünsal
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-05

5.  Pak2 reduction induces a failure of early embryonic development in mice.

Authors:  Juan Zeng; Nengqing Liu; Yinghong Yang; Yi Cheng; Yuanshuai Li; Xiaoxia Guo; Qian Luo; Lifen Zhu; Hongmei Guan; Bing Song; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Flow cytometric assessment of DNA double-strand break and repair kinetics in prediction of intrinsic radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Mohammad-Taghi Bahreyni-Toossi; Mahdieh Dayyani; Mahmoud Mahmoudi; Hosein Azimian
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.532

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.