Literature DB >> 26959213

Association of the Duration of Active Pushing With Obstetric Outcomes.

William A Grobman1, Jennifer Bailit, Yinglei Lai, Uma M Reddy, Ronald J Wapner, Michael W Varner, Steve N Caritis, Mona Prasad, Alan T N Tita, George Saade, Yoram Sorokin, Dwight J Rouse, Sean C Blackwell, Jorge E Tolosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the associations between the duration of active pushing during the second stage of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
METHODS: We performed an observational study in which data were obtained by trained abstractors from maternal and neonatal charts of deliveries at 25 hospitals over a 3-year period. In this secondary analysis, women with no prior cesarean delivery who had a term, singleton, cephalic gestation and reached complete dilation were analyzed. The duration of pushing, defined as the time from initiation of pushing to either vaginal delivery or the decision to proceed with a cesarean delivery, was determined. The primary maternal outcome was cesarean delivery and the primary neonatal outcome was a composite that included: mechanical ventilation, proven sepsis, brachial plexus palsy, clavicular fracture, skull fracture, other fracture, seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or death. Nulliparous and parous women were analyzed separately in univariable and then multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 53,285 women were analyzed. In both nulliparous and parous women, longer duration of pushing was associated with increased odds of both cesarean delivery and the neonatal adverse outcome composite. Nevertheless, even after 4 hours of pushing, approximately 78% of nulliparous women who continued with active pushing had a vaginal delivery and more than 97% did not have the composite adverse neonatal outcome. Similarly, after more than 2 hours of pushing, approximately 82% of parous women who continued active pushing delivered vaginally and more than 97% did not have the adverse neonatal outcome.
CONCLUSION: A longer duration of pushing is associated with an increased relative risk, but small absolute difference in risk, of neonatal complications. Approximately 78% of nulliparous women delivered vaginally even after 4 hours of pushing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26959213      PMCID: PMC4805446          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine: A 5-year report card on a collaborative effort to address maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Mary E D'Alton; Alexander M Friedman; Peter S Bernstein; Haywood L Brown; William M Callaghan; Steven L Clark; William A Grobman; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Daniel F O'Keeffe; Douglas M Montgomery; Sindhu K Srinivas; George D Wendel; Katharine D Wenstrom; Michael R Foley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns.

Authors:  Joshua I Rosenbloom; Molly J Stout; Methodius G Tuuli; Candice L Woolfolk; Julia D López; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A Systematic Review of Intrapartum Fetal Head Compression: What Is the Impact on the Fetal Brain?

Authors:  Kent D Heyborne
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2017-04

5.  Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  A Sandström; M Altman; S Cnattingius; S Johansson; M Ahlberg; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Redefining Second Stage of Labor: Number of Pushing Contractions.

Authors:  Serin M Bok; Gabriela E Pena Carmona; Jake Crawford; Ramy Eskander; Mina Desai; Michael G Ross
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-06-19

7.  FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor.

Authors:  Alison Wright; Anwar H Nassar; Gerry Visser; Diana Ramasauskaite; Gerhard Theron
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Associations between prolonged second stage of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes in freestanding birth centers: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Nancy A Niemczyk; Dianxu Ren; Susan R Stapleton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Value of Cerebroplacental Ratio and Uterine Artery Doppler as Predictors of Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Very Small for Gestational Age at Term Fetuses.

Authors:  Anne Karge; Silvia M Lobmaier; Bernhard Haller; Bettina Kuschel; Javier U Ortiz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.