| Literature DB >> 26959044 |
Aleš Urban1,2, Katrin Burkart3, Jan Kyselý4,5,6, Christian Schuster7, Eva Plavcová8, Hana Hanzlíková9,10, Petr Štěpánek11,12, Tobia Lakes13.
Abstract
The study examines spatial patterns of effects of high temperature extremes on cardiovascular mortality in the Czech Republic at a district level during 1994-2009. Daily baseline mortality for each district was determined using a single location-stratified generalized additive model. Mean relative deviations of mortality from the baseline were calculated on days exceeding the 90th percentile of mean daily temperature in summer, and they were correlated with selected demographic, socioeconomic, and physical-environmental variables for the districts. Groups of districts with similar characteristics were identified according to socioeconomic status and urbanization level in order to provide a more general picture than possible on the district level. We evaluated lagged patterns of excess mortality after hot spell occurrences in: (i) urban areas vs. predominantly rural areas; and (ii) regions with different overall socioeconomic level. Our findings suggest that climatic conditions, altitude, and urbanization generally affect the spatial distribution of districts with the highest excess cardiovascular mortality, while socioeconomic status did not show a significant effect in the analysis across the Czech Republic as a whole. Only within deprived populations, socioeconomic status played a relevant role as well. After taking into account lagged effects of temperature on excess mortality, we found that the effect of hot spells was significant in highly urbanized regions, while most excess deaths in rural districts may be attributed to harvesting effects.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; heat stress; mortality; socioeconomic status; spatial differences
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26959044 PMCID: PMC4808947 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Topography of the Czech Republic (Digital Elevation Model provided by ARCDATA PRAHA) and distribution of regular temperature grid points (GriSt data set as described in [49]).
Figure 2Average summer temperature (June–August 1994–2009) in districts of the Czech Republic calculated from the GriSt data set. Districts are labelled according to the Czech Statistical Office coding [48].
District characteristics tested in the analysis.
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| DevCVD | Mean relative CVD mortality deviations on hot days with average temperature above the 90th percentile in June–August 1994–2009 |
| SES | Index of socioeconomic status; sum of z-scores for % low education, % unemployed and % singles |
| % elderly | % of population older than 65 years |
| % low education | % of population without secondary school diploma |
| % unemployed | % of unemployed population |
| % singles | % of single-person households |
| OECD | % of inhabitants in municipalities with population density less than 150 inhabitants/km2 |
| Summer T (°C) | Mean summer (1 June–31 August 1994–2009) temperature in °C |
| Altitude (m a.s.l.) | Average altitude in metres above sea level |
| % impervious | % of impervious surface area (categories 1.1 and 1.2 in the CORINE land cover classification) |
Figure 3Four groups of districts identified according to high (>0.50 StdDev) and low (<−0.50 StdDev) index of socioeconomic status (SES) and urban (OECD criterion <25%) and rural (OECD criterion > 37.5%) population.
Total population and average demographic, socioeconomic, and physical–environmental characteristics (in 2001) of the four groups of districts presented in Figure 3.
| Characteristic | High SES-Urban | High SES-Rural | Low SES-Rural | Low SES-Urban |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,871,095 | 1,197,212 | 694,115 | 1,170,971 |
| OECD | 5.93 | 48.95 | 50.88 | 10.51 |
| SES | 2.06 | 1.56 | −1.85 | −3.62 |
| % elderly | 15.56 | 13.91 | 12.20 | 11.94 |
| % low education | 49.67 | 65.08 | 68.59 | 65.73 |
| % unemployed | 3.81 | 3.15 | 6.64 | 8.16 |
| % singles | 33.82 | 27.01 | 29.23 | 33.54 |
| Summer T (°C) | 18.4 | 17.4 | 17.6 | 17.5 |
| Altitude (m a.s.l) | 327 | 459 | 392 | 415 |
| % impervious | 29.82 | 4.45 | 4.40 | 13.42 |
Figure 4Spatial distribution of mean relative mortality deviations due to CVDs on hot days (DevCVD). Districts are labelled according to the Czech Statistical Office coding [48].
Spearman’s correlation matrix comparing the mean relative excess mortality due to CVDs on hot days (DevCVD) with independent variables used in the analysis (see Table 1 for description). Significant coefficients with p-value < 0.05 are in bold.
| Independent Variable | DevCVD | SES | % Elderly | % low Education | % Unemployed | % Singles | OECD | Summer T (°C) | Altitude (m a.s.l.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES | 0.01 | 1 | |||||||
| % elderly | 0.14 | 1 | |||||||
| % low education | −0.20 | 1 | |||||||
| % unemployed | 0.12 | 1 | |||||||
| % singles | 0.13 | −0.04 | 0.09 | 1 | |||||
| OECD | −0.22 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1 | |||||
| Summer T (°C) | 0.18 | −0.19 | 0.10 | −0.08 | −0.19 | 1 | |||
| Altitude (m a.s.l.) | −0.05 | −0.13 | −0.09 | 1 | |||||
| % impervious | 0.05 | 0.12 | −0.41 | 0.23 |
Independent variables (see Table 1) chosen by the stepwise regression model as significantly related to the mean relative excess mortality due to CVDs on hot days (DevCVD) in individual districts. Regression coefficients are reported, along with their associated p-values in parentheses.
| Independent Variable | DevCVD |
|---|---|
| SES | ---- |
| % elderly | ---- |
| % low education | ---- |
| % unemployed | ---- |
| % singles | ---- |
| OECD | −0.096 (0.043) |
| Summer T (°C) | 2.922 (0.002) |
| % impervious | ---- |
| R2 | 0.191 |
Linear regression models for mean relative excess mortality due to CVDs on hot days (DevCVD) against index of socioeconomic status (SES), percentage of rural population (OECD criterion), and mean summer temperature (Summer T) for districts with low, intermediate, and high socioeconomic status (SES class). Regression coefficients are reported, along with their associated p-values in parentheses. See Table 1 for description of variables examined. Significant regression coefficients with p-value < 0.05 are in bold.
| SES Class | DevCVD | DevCVD | DevCVD | SES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | ||||
| Intermediate | −3.399 (0.490) | −0.073 (0.407) | 0.008 (0.293) | |
| High | 1.474 (0.842) | 1.234 (0.181) | −0.164 (0.078) | −0.008 (0.347) |
| R2 | 0.086 | 0.160 | 0.107 | 0.878 |
Figure 5Scatterplots comparing mean relative excess mortality due to CVDs on hot days (DevCVD) with index of socioeconomic status (SES), percentage of rural population (OECD criterion), and mean summer temperature (Summer t) for districts with low (<−0.50 StdDev), intermediate (-), and high (>0.50 StdDev) socioeconomic status (SES). Coefficients of regression lines are reported in Table 5. See Table 1 for description of variables examined.
Figure 6Mean relative excess mortality due to CVDs on days D − 2 to D + 14 around a hot spell’s onset in the groups of districts. Confidence bounds around the zero line are indicated by dashed (90%) and solid (95%) lines, respectively.
Figure 7Cumulative excess mortality (relative to the daily baseline mortality) due to CVDs on days D + 0 to D + 3 (ƩD + 0…D + 3) and D + 4 to D + 14 (ƩD + 4…D + 14) after a hot spell’s onset in the groups of districts. * denotes mean cumulative excess mortality above the 95% quantile of a distribution calculated by the Monte Carlo method.