| Literature DB >> 26958897 |
Daniel Caldeira1,2,3, Joaquim J Ferreira1,2, Fausto J Pinto4, João Costa1,2,5,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since the approval and commercialization of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) several studies and meta-analyses have raised safety concerns regarding myocardial infarction (MI) risk among NOAC-treated patients, particularly with dabigatran. Uncertainty remains regarding the coronary risk associated with dabigatran, and whether this putative risk also applies to the other NOACs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the coronary risks of NOACs based on findings from placebo-controlled trials are discussed, and randomized controlled trials and major cohort studies in AF patients are also appraised. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis, including both interventional trials and observational studies ("real-world" data). Further estimates were retrieved from the meta-analysis of coronary risk among NOAC-treated patients with concomitant AF and coronary disease. EXPERT OPINION: Currently, the best available data from both clinical trials and observational studies do not support the claim that patients treated with NOACs, including dabigatran, are at increased coronary risk. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be made (especially regarding dabigatran) and further data are required to address the coronary risks, mostly of high-risk patients. As with any therapeutic intervention, the possible complications should be balanced against the potential benefits at an individual patient level.Entities:
Keywords: DOACs; NOACs; TSOACs; apixaban; dabigatran; edoxaban; myocardial infarction; rivaroxaban
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26958897 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1164689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Opin Drug Saf ISSN: 1474-0338 Impact factor: 4.250