Juliana Chen1, Adrian Bauman2, Margaret Allman-Farinelli1. 1. 1 School of Molecular Bioscience, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia . 2. 2 School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smartphone lifestyle applications (apps) and wearable fitness-tracking devices collect a wealth of data that could provide research insights to support prevention and treatment of obesity and chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to pilot a survey to explore patterns of behavioral tracking using smartphone lifestyle apps and individuals' willingness to share their app-generated data. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey was conducted within a university setting. The 35-item survey asked participants about their self-tracking patterns; use of lifestyle apps and wearable devices; how their self-tracked health data could be useful to them; and any restrictions they would impose on sharing personal data. Responses were tabulated and analyzed for trends. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 101 participants. On average, 3.1 (standard deviation [SD] ±1.9) health and fitness apps were installed by current app users (n = 85), with MyFitnessPal, MapMyRun, Nike+, and Fitbit being most popular. Most participants were willing to share their personal health data for research (77%). Those who did not normally share their health-tracking data were more likely than sharers to be concerned about privacy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.09-16.78), as were those not identifying with the quantified-self movement compared with those who were (OR = 5.04; 95% CI = 1.64-15.50). DISCUSSION: Participants were generally willing to share personal data, thus increasing the potential for these data to inform public health research and for use in targeted personalized program and intervention development. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for partnerships between researchers and commercial app developers or industry could improve public health research and practice.
INTRODUCTION: Smartphone lifestyle applications (apps) and wearable fitness-tracking devices collect a wealth of data that could provide research insights to support prevention and treatment of obesity and chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to pilot a survey to explore patterns of behavioral tracking using smartphone lifestyle apps and individuals' willingness to share their app-generated data. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey was conducted within a university setting. The 35-item survey asked participants about their self-tracking patterns; use of lifestyle apps and wearable devices; how their self-tracked health data could be useful to them; and any restrictions they would impose on sharing personal data. Responses were tabulated and analyzed for trends. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 101 participants. On average, 3.1 (standard deviation [SD] ±1.9) health and fitness apps were installed by current app users (n = 85), with MyFitnessPal, MapMyRun, Nike+, and Fitbit being most popular. Most participants were willing to share their personal health data for research (77%). Those who did not normally share their health-tracking data were more likely than sharers to be concerned about privacy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.09-16.78), as were those not identifying with the quantified-self movement compared with those who were (OR = 5.04; 95% CI = 1.64-15.50). DISCUSSION: Participants were generally willing to share personal data, thus increasing the potential for these data to inform public health research and for use in targeted personalized program and intervention development. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for partnerships between researchers and commercial app developers or industry could improve public health research and practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
apps; data access; data sharing; m-health; public health; smartphone
Authors: Kaylin T Nguyen; Jeffrey E Olgin; Mark J Pletcher; Madelena Ng; Leanne Kaye; Sai Moturu; Rachel A Gladstone; Chaitanya Malladi; Amy H Fann; Carol Maguire; Laura Bettencourt; Matthew A Christensen; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-03
Authors: Filipa Ventura; Pedro Sousa; Maria Anjos Dixe; Paulo Ferreira; Ricardo Martinho; Sara Simões Dias; João Morais; Lino M Gonçalves Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Marco M E Vogel; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Stephanie E Combs Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kerstin Anne Kessel; Marco Me Vogel; Carmen Kessel; Henning Bier; Tilo Biedermann; Helmut Friess; Peter Herschbach; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Bernhard Meyer; Marion Kiechle; Ulrich Keller; Christian Peschel; Roland M Schmid; Stephanie E Combs Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Alyse Davies; Yumeng Shi; Adrian Bauman; Margaret Allman-Farinelli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Virginia Chan; Alyse Davies; Lyndal Wellard-Cole; Silvia Lu; Hoi Ng; Lok Tsoi; Anjali Tiscia; Louise Signal; Anna Rangan; Luke Gemming; Margaret Allman-Farinelli Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.717