Literature DB >> 26958310

Improving guideline concordance in multidisciplinary teams: preliminary results of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating the effect of a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits.

Mariëtte M van Engen-Verheul1, Wouter T Gude1, Sabine N van der Veer2, Hareld M C Kemps3, Monique M W Jaspers1, Nicolette F de Keizer1, Niels Peek4.   

Abstract

Despite their widespread use, audit and feedback (A&F) interventions show variable effectiveness on improving professional performance. Based on known facilitators of successful A&F interventions, we developed a web-based A&F intervention with indicator-based performance feedback, benchmark information, action planning and outreach visits. The goal of the intervention was to engage with multidisciplinary teams to overcome barriers to guideline concordance and to improve overall team performance in the field of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To assess its effectiveness we conducted a cluster-randomized trial in 18 CR clinics (14,847 patients) already working with computerized decision support (CDS). Our preliminary results showed no increase in concordance with guideline recommendations regarding prescription of CR therapies. Future analyses will investigate whether our intervention did improve team performance on other quality indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26958310      PMCID: PMC4765577     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  26 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of nonpharmacological secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Charlotte Meinhard; Kathrin Damm; Christoph Vauth; Angelina Bockelbrink; Wolfgang Greiner; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Lisa M Kern; Erika Abramson; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Modified Rand method to derive quality indicators: a case study in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mariëtte Van Engen-Verheul; Hareld Kemps; Roderik Kraaijenhagen; Nicolette De Keizer; Niels Peek
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

5.  A web-based system to facilitate local, systematic quality improvement by multidisciplinary care teams: development and first experiences of CARDSS Online.

Authors:  Mariëtte M van Engen-Verheul; Sabine N van der Veer; Nicolette F de Keizer; Winston Tjon Sjoe Sjoe; Eric P A van der Zwan; Niels Peek
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

6.  Usability evaluation of a guideline implementation system for cardiac rehabilitation: think aloud study.

Authors:  Mariëtte Van Engen-Verheul; Linda Peute; Ellen Kilsdonk; Niels Peek; Monique Jaspers
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2012

7.  Cardiac rehabilitation uptake and its determinants in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Mariëtte van Engen-Verheul; Han de Vries; Hareld Kemps; Roderik Kraaijenhagen; Nicolette de Keizer; Niels Peek
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 7.804

8.  [Cardiac rehabilitation with lifestyle counselling after myocardial infarction: it helps, but not everyone undergoes it].

Authors:  Petra G Reulings; Sylvia M van der Lans
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2012

9.  Effect of a multifaceted performance feedback strategy on length of stay compared with benchmark reports alone: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care*.

Authors:  Sabine N van der Veer; Maartje L G de Vos; Peter H J van der Voort; Niels Peek; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Gert P Westert; Wilco C Graafmans; Kitty J Jager; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Karen Tu; Jacqueline Young; Jill J Francis; Jan Barnsley; Baiju R Shah; Ross E Upshur; Rahim Moineddin; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of a maternal newborn audit and feedback system in Ontario: a collective case study.

Authors:  Jessica Reszel; Sandra I Dunn; Ann E Sprague; Ian D Graham; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Wendy E Peterson; Holly Ockenden; Jodi Wilding; Ashley Quosdorf; Elizabeth K Darling; Deshayne B Fell; JoAnn Harrold; Andrea Lanes; Graeme N Smith; Monica Taljaard; Deborah Weiss; Mark C Walker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.

Authors:  Jung Yin Tsang; Niels Peek; Iain Buchan; Sabine N van der Veer; Benjamin Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 7.942

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.