Literature DB >> 26958248

Automatic Classification of Structured Product Labels for Pregnancy Risk Drug Categories, a Machine Learning Approach.

Laritza M Rodriguez1, Dina Demner Fushman1.   

Abstract

With regular expressions and manual review, 18,342 FDA-approved drug product labels were processed to determine if the five standard pregnancy drug risk categories were mentioned in the label. After excluding 81 drugs with multiple-risk categories, 83% of the labels had a risk category within the text and 17% labels did not. We trained a Sequential Minimal Optimization algorithm on the labels containing pregnancy risk information segmented into standard document sections. For the evaluation of the classifier on the testing set, we used the Micromedex drug risk categories. The precautions section had the best performance for assigning drug risk categories, achieving Accuracy 0.79, Precision 0.66, Recall 0.64 and F1 measure 0.65. Missing pregnancy risk categories could be suggested using machine learning algorithms trained on the existing publicly available pregnancy risk information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data-mining; document classification; drug risk; knowledge extraction; machine learning; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26958248      PMCID: PMC4765680     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  13 in total

1.  Normalized names for clinical drugs: RxNorm at 6 years.

Authors:  Stuart J Nelson; Kelly Zeng; John Kilbourne; Tammy Powell; Robin Moore
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Etienne Combrisson; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Consistency in the safety labeling of bioequivalent medications.

Authors:  Jon Duke; Jeff Friedlin; Xiaochun Li
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Extracting drug indication information from structured product labels using natural language processing.

Authors:  Kin Wah Fung; Chiang S Jao; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  [An update in drug use during pregnancy: risk classification].

Authors:  M Gallego Úbeda; L Delgado Téllez de Cepeda; M de Los A Campos Fernández de Sevilla; A De Lorenzo Pinto; F Tutau Gómez
Journal:  Farm Hosp       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  LabeledIn: cataloging labeled indications for human drugs.

Authors:  Ritu Khare; Jiao Li; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Semantic processing to identify adverse drug event information from black box warnings.

Authors:  Adam Culbertson; Marcelo Fiszman; Dongwook Shin; Thomas C Rindflesch
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

8.  N-gram support vector machines for scalable procedure and diagnosis classification, with applications to clinical free text data from the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ben J Marafino; Jason M Davies; Naomi S Bardach; Mitzi L Dean; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products; requirements for pregnancy and lactation labeling. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Mining FDA drug labels for medical conditions.

Authors:  Qi Li; Louise Deleger; Todd Lingren; Haijun Zhai; Megan Kaiser; Laura Stoutenborough; Anil G Jegga; Kevin Bretonnel Cohen; Imre Solti
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.