| Literature DB >> 26957761 |
SoonKwon Hong1, JeMyung Shim2, SungJoong Kim2, Seung Namkoong2, HyoLyun Roh2.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in isokinetic muscle function in football athletes with a knee injury with and without kinesio taping. [Subjects] The subjects for this study were 10 football athletes (males) with a knee injury. [Methods] Measurements were performed by using Cybex dynamometer under uniform motion before and after the application of kinesio tape to the quadriceps and hamstring muscle. Maximal concentric knee extension and flexion at three angular velocities (60°/s, 120°/s, and 180°/s) were measured.Entities:
Keywords: Football athletes; Isokinetic function; Kinesio taping
Year: 2016 PMID: 26957761 PMCID: PMC4756007 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Thigh muscle isokinetic function with or without kinesio taping of the affected side
| Variable | Degree(°/s) | Action | Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Peak torque | 60 | Extension | 195.8 | 31.6 | 201.3 | 29.4 |
| Flexion | 110.9 | 22.9 | 115.1 | 19.3 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 160.2 | 20.9 | 165.2 | 21.0 | |
| Flexion | 94.4 | 20.4 | 99.9 | 14.5 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 139.7 | 16.9 | 142.2 | 15.4 | |
| Flexion | 81.1 | 18.5 | 85.9* | 18.5 | ||
| Total work | 60 | Extension | 1,938.0 | 370.0 | 1,964.2 | 323.0 |
| Flexion | 1,185.1 | 300.4 | 1,217.3 | 253.0 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 1,702.5 | 238.1 | 1,744.4 | 231.2 | |
| Flexion | 1,012.9 | 254.1 | 1,104.4* | 206.2 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 1,466.0 | 240.4 | 1,488.2 | 181.7 | |
| Flexion | 863.3 | 250.4 | 930.8 | 226.7 | ||
| Average power | 60 | Extension | 133.5 | 19.4 | 136.8 | 19.6 |
| Flexion | 85.9 | 15.3 | 89.1 | 13.6 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 203.6 | 22.4 | 206.5 | 18.7 | |
| Flexion | 129.4 | 28.8 | 136.9 | 21.0 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 231.9 | 26.9 | 241.4* | 20.9 | |
| Flexion | 142.8 | 30.0 | 152.2 | 28.6 | ||
*p < 0.05
Thigh muscle isokinetic function with or without kinesio taping of the non-affected side
| Variable | Degree(°/s) | Action | Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Peak torque | 60 | Extension | 221.2 | 28.4 | 223.8 | 31.7 |
| Flexion | 126.7 | 15.1 | 118.3* | 16.1 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 174.2 | 24.0 | 179.7* | 18.7 | |
| Flexion | 104.0 | 16.2 | 109.0* | 13.3 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 149.7 | 15.4 | 151.8 | 13.7 | |
| Flexion | 92.9 | 14.5 | 94.1 | 13.5 | ||
| Total work | 60 | Extension | 2,183.2 | 337.4 | 2,230.4 | 389.1 |
| Flexion | 1,413.2 | 281.1 | 1,328.0* | 282.7 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 1,815.2 | 276.7 | 1,864.7 | 282.2 | |
| Flexion | 1,165.9 | 234.0 | 1,211.8 | 176.6 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 1,592.6 | 244.3 | 1,603.2 | 226.3 | |
| Flexion | 1,021.1 | 205.5 | 1,018.3 | 144.8 | ||
| Average power | 60 | Extension | 147.1 | 20.3 | 155.8* | 19.7 |
| Flexion | 101.4 | 14.9 | 95.9 | 15.1 | ||
| 120 | Extension | 216.4 | 22.9 | 224.6* | 21.8 | |
| Flexion | 146.1 | 25.2 | 151.7 | 15.7 | ||
| 180 | Extension | 246.4 | 24.2 | 255.1* | 21.3 | |
| Flexion | 166.9 | 24.8 | 170.3 | 23.5 | ||
*p < 0.05