| Literature DB >> 26957044 |
Taye Gari1,2, Oljira Kenea3, Eskindir Loha4, Wakgari Deressa5, Alemayehu Hailu6,7, Meshesha Balkew8, Teshome Gebre-Michael9, Bjarne Robberstad10, Hans J Overgaard11,12,13, Bernt Lindtjørn14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was part of the work to prepare for a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of combining indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets on malaria incidence. A pilot study was done to estimate the variations of malaria incidence among villages, combined with entomological collections and an assessment of susceptibility to insecticides in malaria vectors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26957044 PMCID: PMC4784280 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1199-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Geographic location of selected kebeles, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia
Fig. 2Malaria cases by Plasmodium species, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia
Socio-demographic variables and incidence rate of malaria among study participants, Adami Tullu district
| Variables | Person-weeks of observation | Malaria cases | Per 10,000 person weeks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| Under 5 | 11,888 | 8 | 6.8 |
| 5–14 | 28,420 | 18 | 6.4 |
| 15–24 | 17,697 | 6 | 3.4 |
| 25 and above | 26,819 | 7 | 2.6 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 42,523 | 22 | 5.2 |
| Female | 42,365 | 17 | 4.1 |
| Distance from Lake /river | |||
| ≤5 kma | 47,080 | 37 | 7.9 |
| >5 kmb | 37,808 | 2 | 0.5 |
| Wealth index | |||
| Poor | 27,024 | 6 | 2.2 |
| Medium | 28,778 | 11 | 3.8 |
| Rich | 28,910 | 22 | 7.7 |
| HH head education | |||
| No formal education | 51,634 | 17 | 3.3 |
| Primary | 18,632 | 15 | 8.1 |
| Secondary | 8160 | 5 | 6.1 |
| Above secondary | 6462 | 2 | 3.1 |
| ITN use | |||
| No | 82,569 | 38 | 4.6 |
| Yes | 2319 | 1 | 4.1 |
HH household
a kebeles within 5 km (Bochesa and Anano Shisho)
b kebeles beyond 5 km (Elika Chelemo and Gallo Rephe) from Zeway Lake shore and river (with potential mosquito breeding sites)
Predictors of malaria episodes, Adami Tullu district
| Variables | Fixed effects coefficients (IRR) | Standard error | 95 % CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1.3 | 0.41 | 0.67–2.41 | 0.46 |
| Female | 1 | |||
| Age in years | ||||
| under 5 | 2.82 | 1.48 | 1.00–7.90 | 0.049* |
| 5–14 | 2.7 | 1.23 | 1.1–6.60 | 0.028* |
| 15–24 | 1.5 | 0.83 | 0.48–4.42 | 0.49 |
| >24 | 1 | |||
| Distance from lake/river | ||||
| ≤5 km | 14.2 | 11 | 3.1–64.7 | 0.0001* |
| > 5 km | 1 | |||
| Wealth status | ||||
| Poor | 0.94 | 0.47 | 0.35–2.45 | 0.9 |
| Medium | 0.7 | 0.27 | 0.33–1.50 | 0.34 |
| Rich | 1 | |||
| HH head education | ||||
| No education | 1.56 | 1.2 | 0.35–7.0 | 0.56 |
| Primary | 1.97 | 1.5 | 0.43–8.96 | 0.38 |
| Secondary | 1.67 | 1.43 | 0.31–9.0 | 0.55 |
| Above secondary | 1 | |||
| ITN use | ||||
| No | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.04–2.81 | 0.32 |
| Yes | 1 | |||
IRR incidence rate ratio, CI 95 % confidence interval
* Significant at p < 0.05
Species composition of adult Anopheles mosquitoes collected in Adami Tullu district
| Village | Species | Collection method | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC-LT | PSC | Pit shelter | |||
| Bochesa |
| 19 (14.7) | 6 (9.2) | 19 (50.0) | 44 (19.0) |
|
| 12 (9.3) | 2 (3.1) | 0 | 14 (6.0) | |
| Elka Chelemo |
| 38 (29.5) | 33 (50.8) | 9 (23.7) | 80 (34.5) |
|
| 30 (23.3) | 3 (4.6) | 0 | 33 (14.2) | |
|
| 5 (3.9) | 0 | 1 (2.6) | 6 (2.6) | |
|
| 9 (7.0) | 0 | 3 (7.9) | 12 (5.2) | |
| Gallo Raphe |
| 14 (10.9) | 21 (32.3) | 6 (15.8) | 41 (17.7) |
|
| 2 (1.6) | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.9) | |
| Total |
| 129 (55.6) | 65 (28.0) | 38 (16.4) | 232 |
CDC-LT Center for Disease Control and Prevention light Trap, PSC Pyrethrum Spray Collection, figures in parentheses indicate percentage
Fig. 3Monthly Anopheles abundance and average precipitation, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia
Fig. 4Mean indoor and outdoor density of Anopheles, Adami Tullu district, EthiopiaHost-seeking density (CDC-LT) = Mean no. Anopheles/light trap/night/house, indoor resting density (PSC pyrethrum spray catch) = mean no. Anopheles/house/45 min in a day, outdoor resting density (Pit shelter) = mean no. Anopheles/pit/30 min in a day
Fig. 5Overall average monthly host-seeking and resting densities of An. arabiensis, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia. Host-seeking density (CDC-LT), indoor resting density (PSC pyrethrum spray catch), outdoor resting density (Pit shelter)
Blood meal sources of the Anopheles species, Adami Tullu district
|
| Collection venues | No. analyzed N (HBI) | Blood meals sources | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human N (HBI) | Bovine N (BBI) | Mixed N (MBI) | Unknown N | |||
|
| CDC-LT | 24 (0.75) | 15 (0.63) | 6 (0.25) | 3 (0.13) | 0 |
| PSC | 48 (0.79) | 35 (0.73) | 10 (0.21) | 3 (0.06) | 0 | |
| Pit shelter | 19 (0.37) | 4 (0.21) | 10 (0.53) | 3 (0.16) | 2 (0.11) | |
| Total | 91 (0.69) | 54 (0.59) | 26 (0.29) | 9 (0.09) | 2 (0.02) | |
|
| CDC-LT | 7 (1.00) | 6 (0.86) | 0 | 1 (0.14) | 0 |
| PSC | 2 (1.00) | 2 (1.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 9 (1.00) | 8 (0.89) | 0 | 1 (0.11) | 0 | |
|
| CDC-LT | 3 (0.67) | 2 (0.67) | 1 (0.33) | 0 | 0 |
| Pit shelter | 3 (0.33) | 0 | 2 (0.67) | 1 (0.33) | 0 | |
| Total | 6 (0.50) | 2 (0.33) | 3 (0.50) | 1 (0.17) | 0 | |
|
| Pit shelter | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall | 107 (0.7) | 64 (0.60) | 30 (0.30) | 11 (0.10) | 2 (0.20) | |
When computing for human blood index (HBI) and bovine blood index (BBI), mixed blood meals were added to the number of human blood and bovine blood meals. Mixed blood meals = human + bovine, unknown blood meals are negative for both human and bovine antibodies, show Soverall HBI
Parity rates and longevity of Anopheles species, Adami Tullu district
| Kebeles | Species | Number of mosquitoes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collected | Dissected | Parous | PR | P | Age (Days) | ||
| Bochesa |
| 44 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 7 |
|
| 14 | 5 | 1 | 0.20 | 0.58 | 1.8 | |
| Elka Chelemo |
| 80 | 9 | 8 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 25 |
|
| 33 | 18 | 11 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 6.3 | |
| Gallo Raphe |
| 41 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 7 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| Average for | 55 | 5 | 4 | 0.8 | 0.93 | 14 | |
| Average for | 16.33 | 25 | 4 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 1.6 | |
PR parity rate, P probability of surviving 1 day
Fig. 6Malaria incidence and mean indoor host seeking density of Anopheles, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia
Fig. 7Insecticide susceptibility of An. arabiensis, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia
Fig. 8Insecticide susceptibility of An. pharoensis, Adami Tullu district, Ethiopia