Literature DB >> 26956635

Safety, Efficacy, and Complications of Pericardiocentesis by Real-Time Echo-Monitored Procedure.

Stefano Maggiolini1, Gaetano Gentile2, Andrea Farina3, Caterina C De Carlini2, Laura Lenatti3, Ester Meles2, Felice Achilli4, Angela Tempesta2, Antonio Brucato5, Massimo Imazio6.   

Abstract

Pericardiocentesis is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusive disease. To date, a number of methods have been developed to reduce complications and increase the success rate of the procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis under continuous echocardiographic monitoring in the management of pericardial effusion. We prospectively performed 161 pericardiocentesis procedures in 141 patients admitted from 1993 to 2015 in 3 centers. This procedure was performed for tamponade or large pericardial effusion in 157 cases and for diagnosis in 4 cases. A percutaneous puncture was performed where the largest amount of fluid was detected. To perform a real-time echo-guided procedure, a multi-angle bracket was mounted on the echocardiographic probe to support the needle and enable its continuous visualization during the puncture. The procedure was successful in 160 of 161 cases (99%). Two major complications occurred (1.2%): 1 mediastinal hematoma that required surgical drainage in a patient on anticoagulant therapy and 1 pleuropericardial shunt requiring thoracentesis. Seven minor complications occurred (4.3%): 1 pleuropericardial shunt, 1 case of transient AV type III block, 3 vasovagal reactions (1 with syncope), and 2 cases of acute pulmonary edema managed with medical therapy. No punctures of any cardiac chamber occurred, and emergency surgical drainage was not required in any case. In conclusion, echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis under continuous visualization is effective, safe, and easy to perform, even in hospitals with low volumes of procedures with or without cardiac surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956635     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: a systematic review concerning contemporary evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eduardo M Vilela; Catarina Ruivo; Claudio E Guerreiro; Marisa P Silva; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Daniel Caeiro; Gustavo P Morais; João Primo; Pedro Braga; Nuno Ferreira; José Pedro L Nunes; Vasco Gama Ribeiro
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-08-15

2.  A Novel, Low-cost, Low-fidelity Pericardiocentesis Teaching Model.

Authors:  Spencer Lord; Garrett Lord; Sean P Geary
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-19

3.  Hemorrhagic shock due to branch injury of the left internal thoracic artery two days after pericardiocentesis.

Authors:  Sadahiro Hijikata; Takamichi Miyamoto; Tetsuo Yamaguchi; Junji Yamaguchi; Takamasa Iwai; Keita Watanabe; Yuichiro Sagawa; Ryo Masuda; Ryoichi Miyazaki; Naoyuki Miwa; Nobuhiro Hara; Yasutoshi Nagata; Toshihiro Nozato
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2018-03-30

4.  Performance, pain, and quality of life on use of central venous catheter for management of pericardial effusions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Kamran Ghods; Mohammad Reza Razavi; Mohammad Forozeshfard
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 5.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade.

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Casares; Sergi Cesar; Laia Brunet-Garcia; Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis: a novel parasternal approach.

Authors:  Adi Osman; Tan Wan Chuan; Jamalludin Ab Rahman; Gabriele Via; Guido Tavazzi
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.799

7.  Effusion and coin shadow: is there a relation? A case report.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohsen Mohamed
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 8.  ABCDE of prehospital ultrasonography: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rein Ketelaars; Gabby Reijnders; Geert-Jan van Geffen; Gert Jan Scheffer; Nico Hoogerwerf
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Minimal Cardiac Perforation by Lead Pacemaker Complicated with Pericardial Effusion and Impending Tamponade: Optimal Management with No Pericardiocentesis Driven by Echocardiography.

Authors:  Carlo Caiati; Paolo Pollice; Luigi Truncellito; Mario Erminio Lepera; Stefano Favale
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-30

10.  Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Difen Wang; Ying Liu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.