Literature DB >> 26956581

Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery.

Chang-Nam Kim1, Sung Uk Bae2, Seul-Gi Lee3, Seung Hyun Yang3, In Gun Hyun3, Je Ho Jang3, Byung Sun Cho3, Joo Seung Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A robotic system was mainly designed to allow precise dissection in deep and narrow spaces. We report the clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Between July 2009 and January 2012, 60 consecutive patients undergoing robotic surgery for rectal cancer at the Eulji University Hospital were included.
RESULTS: The mean total operation time, docking time, and surgeon console time were 466.8 ± 115.6, 7.5 ± 6.7, and 261 ± 87.5 min, respectively. Oral intake of diet was started at 3.3 ± 0.9 days and the mean hospital stay was 8.6 ± 2.4 days. All 60 procedures were technically successful without the need for conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. Complications included anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, postoperative bleeding, ileus, and perineal wound infection in 3 (5 %), 1 (1.7 %), 2 (3.3 %), 2 (3.3 %), and 1 (1.7 %) patient, respectively. The mean distal resection margin and total number of lymph nodes harvested was 3.1 ± 1.7 cm and 20.1 ± 11.5, respectively. During the mean follow-up period of 48.5 months (range, 7-75), the 4-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 87.7 and 72.8 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A totally robotic approach for rectal cancer operations was a time-consuming procedure, although we already had a lot experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, the dexterity of the robotic surgery could enable the surgeon to expand the choice of surgical methods according to the condition of the rectal cancer without the need for conversion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Outcome assessment; Rectal neoplasms; Robotic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956581     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2544-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  What is a safe distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients treated by low anterior resection without preoperative radiotherapy?

Authors:  T E Bernstein; B H Endreseth; P Romundstad; A Wibe
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Robotic surgery: colon and rectum.

Authors:  Seong Kyu Baek; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Heum Baek; Shaun McKenzie; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Byung Ho Nam; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Taek-Gu Lee; Dae Yong Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Hye-Seung Lee; Sun Young Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Jee Hyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study.

Authors:  Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Circumferential resection margin involvement in stage III rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Hyunki Kim; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Puja Shah Berry; Charles M Friel; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Yung-Sung Yeh; Wei-Chih Su; Ming-Yii Huang; Chun-Ming Huang; Yu-Tang Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Chi Zhou; Xian-Rui Wu; Xuan-Hui Liu; Yu-Feng Chen; Jia Ke; Xiao-Wen He; Xiao-Sheng He; Tuo Hu; Yi-Feng Zou; Xiao-Bin Zheng; Hua-Shan Liu; Jian-Cong Hu; Xiao-Jian Wu; Jian-Ping Wang; Ping Lan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2018-02-14

4.  Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Po-Li Wei; Chien-Chih Chen; Li-Jen Kuo; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Hassan A Alsaleem; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.