Literature DB >> 26956356

Concerns and Structural Barriers Associated with WIC Participation among WIC-Eligible Women.

Cindy H Liu1, Heidi Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine sociodemographic status, psychosocial concerns, and structural barriers associated with women's participation in the USDA's Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program among those eligible for the program. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A total of 1,634 White, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI) women from the New York City area completed the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from 2004 to 2007, a population-based survey. MEASURES: Data on WIC eligibility and participation, sociodemographic details, unintended pregnancy, social support, and structural barriers were evaluated.
RESULTS: Hispanics and Blacks were 4.1 and 2.4 times more likely to participate, respectively, in the WIC program relative to Whites. Mothers reporting unplanned pregnancies, fewer social supports, and more structural barriers (e.g., transportation) were less likely to participate in WIC. Race-stratified analyses revealed race/ethnic differences in the pattern of barriers; unintended pregnancy and structural problems were barriers associated with WIC participation particularly for A/PI.
CONCLUSIONS: WIC-eligible women with unintended pregnancies and fewer social supports tend to participate in WIC, but those who experience more structural barriers are less likely to participate. A/PI women may face specific challenges to WIC participation. Careful attention is needed to understand the unique attitudes and behaviors in the process of participating in WIC.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian Americans; PRAMS; health care disparities; prenatal care; public assistance; secondary data analysis; social support

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956356      PMCID: PMC5527844          DOI: 10.1111/phn.12259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  16 in total

1.  Inequalities in use of specialty mental health services among Latinos, African Americans, and non-Latino whites.

Authors:  Margarita Alegría; Glorisa Canino; Ruth Ríos; Mildred Vera; José Calderón; Dana Rusch; Alexander N Ortega
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Immigration legal status and use of public programs and prenatal care.

Authors:  P L Geltman; A F Meyers
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  1999-04

3.  Sources of stigma for means-tested government programs.

Authors:  Jennifer Stuber; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City.

Authors:  Ted Joyce; Diane Gibson; Silvie Colman
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2005

5.  Health disparities: a barrier to high-quality care.

Authors:  C Daniel Mullins; Lisa Blatt; Confidence M Gbarayor; Hui-Wen Keri Yang; Claudia Baquet
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

6.  Prenatal attitudes and parity predict selection into a U.S. child health program: a short report.

Authors:  Sarah Martin-Anderson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Janet Currie
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2005

8.  Why do WIC participants fail to pick up their checks? An urban study in the wake of welfare reform.

Authors:  Terry J Rosenberg; Julie K Alperen; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depressive symptoms among women enrolled in WIC.

Authors:  Jennifer Pooler; Deborah F Perry; Reem M Ghandour
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-12

10.  Rates and predictors of postpartum depression by race and ethnicity: results from the 2004 to 2007 New York City PRAMS survey (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System).

Authors:  Cindy H Liu; Ed Tronick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Caregiver Perspectives on Underutilization of WIC: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Cristina M Gago; Jhordan O Wynne; Maggie J Moore; Alejandra Cantu-Aldana; Kelsey Vercammen; Laura Y Zatz; Kelley May; Tina Andrade; Terri Mendoza; Sarah L Stone; Josiemer Mattei; Kirsten K Davison; Eric B Rimm; Rachel Colchamiro; Erica L Kenney
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  WIC Participants' Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Changes to WIC Recertification and Service Delivery.

Authors:  Alison K Ventura; Catherine E Martinez; Shannon E Whaley
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-09-23

3.  "It Was Actually Pretty Easy": COVID-19 Compliance Cost Reductions in the WIC Program.

Authors:  Carolyn Barnes; Sarah Petry
Journal:  Public Adm Rev       Date:  2021-09-09

4.  Qualitative Analysis of Maternal Barriers and Perceptions to Participation in a Federal Supplemental Nutrition Program in Rural Appalachian North Carolina.

Authors:  Sydeena E Isaacs; Lenka Shriver; Lauren Haldeman
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2020-09-01

5.  Revisiting the Relationship between WIC Participation and Breastfeeding among Low-Income Children in the U.S. after the 2009 WIC Food Package Revision.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Chun Chen; Hong Xue; Kayoung Park; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Responding to the pressing yet unrecognized needs of student-parents amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hung-Chu Lin; Paula L Zeanah; Dianne F Olivier; Megan A Bergeron; Cindy H Liu
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Trends in Food Insecurity in the United States from 2011-2017: Disparities by Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Income.

Authors:  Rebekah J Walker; Emma Garacci; Aprill Z Dawson; Joni S Williams; Mukoso Ozieh; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Association of participation in a supplemental nutrition program with stillbirth by race, ethnicity, and maternal characteristics.

Authors:  Meghan Angley; Vanessa R Thorsten; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Donald J Dudley; Robert L Goldenberg; Robert M Silver; Barbara J Stoll; Halit Pinar; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Mobile Phone Apps for Low-Income Participants in a Public Health Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): Review and Analysis of Features.

Authors:  Summer J Weber; Daniela Dawson; Haley Greene; Pamela C Hull
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Grocery Delivery of Healthy Foods to Pregnant Young Women With Low Incomes: Feasibility and Acceptability Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Ione Locher; Marika Waselewski; Tammy Chang; Kendrin Sonneville; Ken Resnicow
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2020-12-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.