Literature DB >> 26956285

Pseudo-CT generation in brain MR-PET attenuation correction: comparison of several multi-atlas methods.

Ines Merida1,2,3, Nicolas Costes2,4, Rolf Heckemann5, Alexander Hammers2,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26956285      PMCID: PMC4798712          DOI: 10.1186/2197-7364-2-S1-A29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Phys        ISSN: 2197-7364


× No keyword cloud information.
Simultaneous MR-PET imaging opens new perspectives for understanding many aspects of brain function. However, accurate brain attenuation correction (AC) is required for absolute PET quantification. Radiodensity maps for AC are not readily available in PET-MR. Various strategies have been proposed to generate substitute attenuation maps. Recently, it has been shown that multiatlas techniques for AC outperform methods based on MR imaging sequences, such as Ultrashort-Echo-Time. We recently investigated several multiatlas methods to build a patient-specific pseudoCT, all based on multiatlas registration and label propagation, and introduced a novel maximum probability method (MaxProb). Here, a new database of 40 MR/CT image pairs (atlases) was used. Pairwise nonrigid registration of each atlas MR image to the target MR image yielded a geometric transformation that we used for propagating the atlas CT into the target’s space. The synthetic CT was generated by voxelwise atlas selection and intensity averaging. We implemented a state-of-the-art algorithm along with two variants and MaxProb. A pseudoCT was generated for each subject of the database and assessed by comparison with the real CT in a leave-one-out scheme. Jaccard overlap indices were computed per tissue class (air, soft tissue, and bone). Voxel classification error was also assessed. The Jaccard indices and voxel classification error showed that MaxProb (8.31±1.12%) performed slightly better than Ref (8.65±0.93%). The influence of the number of atlases fused in pseudoCT generation was studied, showing that an optimal number improves accuracy. By adjusting the number of fused atlases, it was possible to significantly improve on Ref (8.46±0.96%). The methods now need evaluation on quantitative PET data to identify potential benefits in PET analysis.
  5 in total

Review 1.  From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.

Authors:  Zhaolin Chen; Sharna D Jamadar; Shenpeng Li; Francesco Sforazzini; Jakub Baran; Nicholas Ferris; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Accurate hybrid template-based and MR-based attenuation correction using UTE images for simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging applications.

Authors:  Jakub Baran; Zhaolin Chen; Francesco Sforazzini; Nicholas Ferris; Sharna Jamadar; Ben Schmitt; David Faul; Nadim Jon Shah; Marian Cholewa; Gary F Egan
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Validation of PET/MRI attenuation correction methodology in the study of brain tumours.

Authors:  Francesca De Luca; Martin Bolin; Lennart Blomqvist; Cecilia Wassberg; Heather Martin; Anna Falk Delgado
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Accuracy and precision of zero-echo-time, single- and multi-atlas attenuation correction for dynamic [11C]PE2I PET-MR brain imaging.

Authors:  João M Sousa; Lieuwe Appel; Inés Merida; Rolf A Heckemann; Nicolas Costes; Mathias Engström; Stergios Papadimitriou; Dag Nyholm; Håkan Ahlström; Alexander Hammers; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  CERMEP-IDB-MRXFDG: a database of 37 normal adult human brain [18F]FDG PET, T1 and FLAIR MRI, and CT images available for research.

Authors:  Inés Mérida; Julien Jung; Alexander Hammers; Nicolas Costes; Sandrine Bouvard; Didier Le Bars; Sophie Lancelot; Franck Lavenne; Caroline Bouillot; Jérôme Redouté
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.