Literature DB >> 26956178

Regulating wild boar populations is "somebody else's problem"! - Human dimension in wild boar management.

Oliver Keuling1, Egbert Strauß2, Ursula Siebert3.   

Abstract

As a part of the ongoing game survey of the German federal state of Lower Saxony (WTE), we conducted inquiries into wild boar management and distribution, as well as hunters' attitudes, in order to determine the reasons for the increase of wild boar populations and to inform our game management strategy. According to hunters' reports within the WTE, increases in distribution and population continue and a reduction of the wild boar population has been deemed necessary on a large scale. In the home region, however, it seems to be "somebody else's problem" (SEP), according to hunters' opinions. The majority of hunters are not able to regulate the population and this could be a reason that wild boar numbers continue to increase. Cooperation and comprehensive hunting with efficient hunting methods seems to be the most promising solution, as non-hunting methods are unpopular amongst hunters. The hunters seem to be aware of the problems, solutions and contributing factors; however, most hunters do not feel responsible and see the management of wild boar, again, as a SEP. Regional conditions, as well as hunters' willingness and capacity to manage wild boar will have to be incorporated into management concepts.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human dimension; Hunters' opinion poll; Hunting efficiency; Monitoring; Sus scrofa; Wildlife management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956178     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Behaviour of free ranging wild boar towards their dead fellows: potential implications for the transmission of African swine fever.

Authors:  Carolina Probst; Anja Globig; Bent Knoll; Franz J Conraths; Klaus Depner
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Habitat requirements of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus PALLAS 1778) in an intensively used agriculture region (Lower Saxony, Germany).

Authors:  Katharina Sliwinski; Katrin Ronnenberg; Klaus Jung; Egbert Strauß; Ursula Siebert
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.964

3.  Too many wild boar? Modelling fertility control and culling to reduce wild boar numbers in isolated populations.

Authors:  Simon Croft; Barbara Franzetti; Robin Gill; Giovanna Massei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Zoning has little impact on the seasonal diel activity and distribution patterns of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in an UNESCO Biosphere Reserve.

Authors:  Henrik Reinke; Hannes J König; Oliver Keuling; Tobias Kuemmerle; Christian Kiffner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Assessing mammal trapping standards in wild boar drop-net capture.

Authors:  Roser Velarde; Gregorio Mentaberre; Carles Conejero; Jorge Ramón López-Olvera; Carlos González-Crespo; Arián Ráez-Bravo; Raquel Castillo-Contreras; Stefania Tampach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Endangered animals and plants are positively or neutrally related to wild boar (Sus scrofa) soil disturbance in urban grasslands.

Authors:  Valentin Cabon; Miriam Bùi; Henning Kühne; Birgit Seitz; Ingo Kowarik; Moritz von der Lippe; Sascha Buchholz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  R0 Estimation for the African Swine Fever Epidemics in Wild Boar of Czech Republic and Belgium.

Authors:  Andrea Marcon; Annik Linden; Petr Satran; Vincenzo Gervasi; Alain Licoppe; Vittorio Guberti
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.