Literature DB >> 26956177

Nitrogen accumulation and partitioning in a High Arctic tundra ecosystem from extreme atmospheric N deposition events.

Sonal Choudhary1, Aimeric Blaud2, A Mark Osborn3, Malcolm C Press4, Gareth K Phoenix2.   

Abstract

Arctic ecosystems are threatened by pollution from recently detected extreme atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition events in which up to 90% of the annual N deposition can occur in just a few days. We undertook the first assessment of the fate of N from extreme deposition in High Arctic tundra and are presenting the results from the whole ecosystem (15)N labelling experiment. In 2010, we simulated N depositions at rates of 0, 0.04, 0.4 and 1.2 g Nm(-2)yr(-1), applied as (15)NH4(15)NO3 in Svalbard (79(°)N), during the summer. Separate applications of (15)NO3(-) and (15)NH4(+) were also made to determine the importance of N form in their retention. More than 95% of the total (15)N applied was recovered after one growing season (~90% after two), demonstrating a considerable capacity of Arctic tundra to retain N from these deposition events. Important sinks for the deposited N, regardless of its application rate or form, were non-vascular plants>vascular plants>organic soil>litter>mineral soil, suggesting that non-vascular plants could be the primary component of this ecosystem to undergo measurable changes due to N enrichment from extreme deposition events. Substantial retention of N by soil microbial biomass (70% and 39% of (15)N in organic and mineral horizon, respectively) during the initial partitioning demonstrated their capacity to act as effective buffers for N leaching. Between the two N forms, vascular plants (Salix polaris) in particular showed difference in their N recovery, incorporating four times greater (15)NO3(-) than (15)NH4(+), suggesting deposition rich in nitrate will impact them more. Overall, these findings show that despite the deposition rates being extreme in statistical terms, biologically they do not exceed the capacity of tundra to sequester pollutant N during the growing season. Therefore, current and future extreme events may represent a major source of eutrophication. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (15)N tracer; Arctic tundra N pools; Ecosystem N dynamics; Extreme nitrogen deposition; N immobilisation; Plant–soil interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956177     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Contrasting survival and physiological responses of sub-Arctic plant types to extreme winter warming and nitrogen.

Authors:  Stef Bokhorst; Laura Jaakola; Katja Karppinen; Guro K Edvinsen; Hanne K Mæhre; Jarle W Bjerke
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Influences of summer warming and nutrient availability on Salix glauca L. growth in Greenland along an ice to sea gradient.

Authors:  Angela Luisa Prendin; Signe Normand; Marco Carrer; Nanna Bjerregaard Pedersen; Henning Matthiesen; Andreas Westergaard-Nielsen; Bo Elberling; Urs Albert Treier; Jørgen Hollesen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Accelerated vegetation succession but no hydrological change in a boreal fen during 20 years of recent climate change.

Authors:  Tiina H M Kolari; Pasi Korpelainen; Timo Kumpula; Teemu Tahvanainen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Bryophytes and Organic layers Control Uptake of Airborne Nitrogen in Low-N Environments.

Authors:  Alexandra Bähring; Andreas Fichtner; Uta Friedrich; Goddert von Oheimb; Werner Härdtle
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Nitrate is an important nitrogen source for Arctic tundra plants.

Authors:  Xue-Yan Liu; Keisuke Koba; Lina A Koyama; Sarah E Hobbie; Marissa S Weiss; Yoshiyuki Inagaki; Gaius R Shaver; Anne E Giblin; Satoru Hobara; Knute J Nadelhoffer; Martin Sommerkorn; Edward B Rastetter; George W Kling; James A Laundre; Yuriko Yano; Akiko Makabe; Midori Yano; Cong-Qiang Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.