| Literature DB >> 26955635 |
Petro E Mabeyo1, Mkabwa L K Manoko2, Amra Gruhonjic3, Paul A Fitzpatrick4, Göran Landberg4, Máté Erdélyi5, Stephen S Nyandoro1.
Abstract
Selenium deficiency in humans has been associated with various diseases, the risks of which can be reduced through dietary supplementation. Selenium accumulating plants may provide a beneficial nutrient for avoiding such illnesses. Thus, leafy vegetables such as Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus sp., Cucurbita maxima, Ipomoea batatas, Solanum villosum, Solanum scabrum, and Vigna unguiculata were explored for their capabilities to accumulate selenium when grown on selenium enriched soil and for use as a potential source of selenium enriched functional foods. Their selenium contents were determined by spectrophotometry using the complex of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine hydrochloride (DABH) as a chromogen. The mean concentrations in the leaves were found to range from 7.90 ± 0.40 to 1.95 ± 0.12 μg/g dry weight (DW), with C. maxima accumulating the most selenium. In stems, the accumulated selenium content ranged from 1.12 ± 0.10 μg/g in Amaranthus sp. to 5.35 ± 0.78 μg/g DW in C. maxima and was hence significantly different (P < 0.01). The cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was used in cytotoxicity assays to determine the anticancer potential of these extracts. With exception of S. scabrum and S. villosum, no cytotoxicity was detected for the selenium enriched vegetable extracts up to 100 μg/mL concentration. Hence, following careful evaluation the studied vegetables may be considered as selenium enriched functional foods.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26955635 PMCID: PMC4756630 DOI: 10.1155/2015/549676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Figure 1(a) Amaranthus hybridus, (b) Cucurbita maxima, (c) Solanum villosum, (d) Solanum scabrum, (e) Vigna unguiculata, (f) Ipomoea batatas, (g) Amaranthus sp., (h) Amaranthus hybridus seeds, and (i) Amaranthus sp. seeds.
Method validation: the concentration of extracts possessing known amounts of selenium determined by gravimetric analyses and by UV spectrophotometry.
| Concentration [Se (VI)] spiked ( | Mean absorbance | Measured concentration ( | Recovery (%) | Recovery (%) ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 93.10 | 94.56 ± 1.44 |
| 3 | 0.17 | 2.88 | 95.97 | |
| 5 | 0.27 | 4.73 | 94.60 |
Selenium concentration (µg/g) in vegetable samples.
| Vegetable species | Mean concentration ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves samples | Stems samples | |||||
| Early harvest | Late harvest | Control | Early harvest | Late harvest | Control | |
|
| 5.86 ± 0.46 | 7.01 ± 0.21 | 0.75 ± 0.16 | 3.39 ± 0.41 | 4.37 ± 0.13 | 0.56 ± 0.09 |
|
| 6.49 ± 0.26 | 7.90 ± 0.40 | 1.30 ± 0.27 | 2.32 ± 0.32 | 5.35 ± 0.78 | 0.56 ± 0.13 |
|
| 2.37 ± 0.37 | 2.81 ± 0.09 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.09 | 1.97 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
|
| 1.95 ± 0.12 | 2.21 ± 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 1.12 ± 0.10 | 1.83 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.16 |
|
| 3.05 ± 0.69 | 4.48 ± 1.61 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 2.39 ± 0.40 | 2.57 ± 0.60 | 0.37 ± 0.01 |
|
| 3.25 ± 0.36 | 4.11 ± 0.99 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 2.53 ± 0.05 | 2.73 ± 0.10 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
|
| 4.13 ± 0.41 | 5.56 ± 1.42 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 3.10 ± 0.21 | 3.08 ± 0.18 | 0.45 ± 0.04 |
The one-way ANOVA for the late, the early, and the control harvests of vegetables.
| Test samples |
| Average | Variances | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLH versus CS | 1.61675 | 4.86943 | 4.3871 |
|
| 0.52871 | 0.14622 | |||
|
| ||||
| LSH versus CS | 1.06056 | 3.12829 | 1.65798 |
|
| 0.34643 | 0.03463 | |||
|
| ||||
| ELH versus CS | 3.11278 | 3.871 | 2.98636 |
|
| 0.52871 | 0.14622 | |||
|
| ||||
| ESH versus CS | 7.71689 | 2.29643 | 0.74049 |
|
| 0.34643 | 0.03463 | |||
|
| ||||
| LLH versus ELH | 0.34985 | 4.86943 | 4.3871 | ns |
| 3.871 | 2.98636 | |||
|
| ||||
| LSH versus ESH | 0.18075 | 3.12829 | 1.65798 | ns |
| 2.29643 | 0.74049 | |||
ELH: early leaf harvest, LLH: late leaf harvest, ESH: early stem harvest, LSH: late stem harvest, CS: control samples, ∗∗: very significant difference, and ns: no significant difference.
Selenium concentrations observed for Amaranthus seeds.
| Vegetable species | Concentration | Mean concentration, ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asc | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
| Ast | 1.32 | 1.21 | 1.27 | 1.26 ± 0.06 |
| Ahc | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.36 ± 0.06 |
| Aht | 2.07 | 2.31 | 2.43 | 2.27 ± 0.18 |
Asc: control samples of Amaranthus sp. seeds, Ast: treated samples of Amaranthus sp. seeds, Ahc: control samples of A. hybridus seeds, and Aht: treated samples of A. hybridus seeds.
Selenium concentration of soil samples.
| Soil samples | Concentration | Mean concentration, ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSA | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.43 ± 0.03 |
| ASA | 18.43 | 29.43 | 22.78 | 23.55 ± 5.54 |
| AVH | 0.88 | 0.93 | 1.35 | 1.05 ± 0.26 |
BSA: before selenium application, ASA: after selenium application, and AVH: after vegetable harvest.
Cytotoxicity evaluation of the water extracts against the human MDA-MB-231 cell line.
| Vegetable leaves extract | Concentration | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | <100 | |||||
| A | B | C | A | B | C | |
| SV | + | + | + | − | − | + |
| SS | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| IB | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| AH | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| AS | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| CM | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| VU | − | − | − | − | − | − |
SV: Solanum villosum, SS: Solanum scabrum, IB: Ipomoea batatas, AH: Amaranthus hybridus, AS: Amaranthus sp., CM: Cucurbita maxima, VU: Vigna unguiculata, A: early harvest Se enriched samples, B: late harvest Se enriched samples, C: control samples, “+”: cytotoxicity observed, and “−”: no cytotoxicity observed.