| Literature DB >> 26955614 |
Dhong Won Lee1, Min Jeong Kim2, Woo Jong Kim3, Jeong Ku Ha4, Jin Goo Kim5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in young adults with symptomatic Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) and compare those in young adults without OSD.Entities:
Keywords: Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osgood-Schlatter disease; Patellar tendon; Tendinopathy; Tibia
Year: 2016 PMID: 26955614 PMCID: PMC4779807 DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2016.28.1.62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2234-0726
Patient Demographics
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
OS: Osgood-Schlatter disease.
a)The values were evaluated only in the OS group.
Fig. 1Magnetic resonance imaging scans of a patient with Osgood-Schlatter disease (A) and a patient in the control group (B). (1): the distance between the inferior patella and the most proximal attachment site of the patellar tendon onto the tibial tuberosity or the ossicle, (2): the distance between the inferior patella and the most distal attachment site of the patellar tendon onto the tibial tuberosity, (3): the distance between the most proximal attachment of the patellar tendon onto the tibial tuberosity or the ossicle and the most distal region of the tibial tuberosity, (4): the distance between the tibial articular surface and the most distal region of the tibial tuberosity.
Comparison of MRI Findings between the OS Group and the Control Group
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, OS: Osgood-Schlatter disease, FPTP: free patellar tendon proportion, TAP: tibial attachment proportion, PT: patellar tendon.
Fig. 2T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan. The white arrow indicates the thickened patellar tendon and bone marrow edema that contains the area of high signal intensity with the nonunited fragment.