Literature DB >> 26955463

Strategies to Prevent the Emergence of Radiation-Induced Malignancies.

Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava1, Prateek Saurabh Shrivastava1, Jegadeesh Ramasamy1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26955463      PMCID: PMC4763465          DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.175993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prev Med        ISSN: 2008-7802


× No keyword cloud information.
DEAR EDITOR, Radiations are categorized as ionizing radiation (viz., alpha particle, beta particles, neutrons, etc.,) and nonionizing radiation (viz., infrared, microwaves, radio waves, etc.,) based on their ability/inability to liberate electrons from atoms or molecules.[12] Humans are generally exposed to both natural and man-made sources of radiation during the course of their lives.[12] Although radiation has definitive applications in fields such as medicine, industry, and research, it remains a major cause of health concern if not properly used.[13] Multiple adverse consequences, such as acute events (such as skin burns and local radiation injuries); malignancy; congenital anomalies; and even death, have been reported in cases of exposure to radiations beyond the permissible limits.[123] Furthermore, subsequent to a nuclear accident, a remarkable rise in the incidence of psychological distress and psychiatric conditions (such as posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, and alcohol abuse) have been observed among the survivors.[45] However, attributes such as age at the time of exposure, type of radiation, radiation dose, exposure duration, and sensitivity of tissues/organs, eventually determine the extent of radiation-induced damage.[167] It has been observed that incidence of radiation-induced malignancy/complications is still on the rise in heterogeneous settings, because of the presentation of clinical symptoms after a long interval; poor awareness among general population about the sources or side effects of radiation; limited orientation of medical students about assessment of radiation exposure; the absence or poor quality of protective devices in industries; nonutilization of the protective equipments despite their availability; no uniformity in the preplacement examination or regular health check-up; lack of infrastructure to enable early diagnosis; and limited access to information about supportive care services.[135] To address the above-mentioned challenges and thus bring about a significant reduction in the incidence of radiation associated malignancy, there is a crucial need that policy makers should explore all possible sources of radiation exposure, and then develop interventions in coordination with different stakeholders.[15] These strategies include promoting thorough risk assessment among the exposed persons;[4] developing a model to establish a relationship between time since exposure/age at exposure to radiation-induced malignancy;[7] advocating implementation of appropriate preventive strategies in the industries;[3] sensitizing physicians, population, and health professionals about radiation-induced malignancies;[3] developing guidelines to ensure standardized case management based on the exposed dose of radiation and patient-related variables;[8] establishing a mechanism to ensure follow-up of at-risk populations to encourage early detection and prompt initiation of specific treatment;[48] building a strategic plan to enable preparedness, evacuation and relocation of people at times of any nuclear accident;[45] and fostering linkages with international organizations to strengthen the overall system.[1] In conclusion, both ionizing and nonionizing radiations have been attributed to the causation of multiple cancers. Thus, it is the responsibility of the policy makers and other stakeholders to work in collaboration to eventually reduce the contribution of radiation on the development of malignancies.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Health effects of radiation and other health problems in the aftermath of nuclear accidents, with an emphasis on Fukushima.

Authors:  Arifumi Hasegawa; Koichi Tanigawa; Akira Ohtsuru; Hirooki Yabe; Masaharu Maeda; Jun Shigemura; Tetsuya Ohira; Takako Tominaga; Makoto Akashi; Nobuyuki Hirohashi; Tetsuo Ishikawa; Kenji Kamiya; Kenji Shibuya; Shunichi Yamashita; Rethy K Chhem
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  [Investigation of non-ionizing radiation hazards from physiotherapy equipment in 16 medical institutions].

Authors:  Jia-xi He; Wei Zhou; Hai-li Qiu; Guang-tao Yang
Journal:  Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi       Date:  2013-12

3.  Dose rate dependence of radiation cancer risk as measured by non-tumor dose.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tanooka
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Time trends in incidence of cutaneous melanoma by detailed anatomical location and patterns of ultraviolet radiation exposure: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Daniela Gordon; Peter Gillgren; Sandra Eloranta; Henrik Olsson; Max Gordon; Johan Hansson; Karin E Smedby
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  The Fukushima Health Management Survey: estimation of external doses to residents in Fukushima Prefecture.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ishikawa; Seiji Yasumura; Kotaro Ozasa; Gen Kobashi; Hiroshi Yasuda; Makoto Miyazaki; Keiichi Akahane; Shunsuke Yonai; Akira Ohtsuru; Akira Sakai; Ritsu Sakata; Kenji Kamiya; Masafumi Abe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.