| Literature DB >> 26955439 |
Ayoob Rostamzadeh1, Mohsen Mohammadi2, Reza Ahmadi3, Afshin Nazari4, Omar Ghaderi5, Maryam Anjomshoa6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Today, the use of electromagnetic waves in medical diagnostic devices, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has increased, and many of its biological effects have been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess the biological effects of 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on fertility and reproductive parameters.Entities:
Keywords: MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging); embryo morphometry; fertility
Year: 2016 PMID: 26955439 PMCID: PMC4768917 DOI: 10.19082/1701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electron Physician ISSN: 2008-5842
Figure 1Transfer of mice to the MRI scanner in a plastic container
Figure 2Bolto scale for quantitative assessment of 2-cell embryos on culture medium
Figure 3Use of the public image analysis software program Image J for morphometric analysis of embryos: The largest diameter was selected as a base for all quantitative embryo assessment in all groups (10 micrometer-scale). The diameter of the perivitelline space was approximately measured by the overall diameter minus the thickness of the cytoplasm diameter minus the total thickness of zona pellucid.
Quantitative data of embryo cleavage in control and study groups several days after MRI irradiation
| Groups/Days | Two-cell | Blastocyst | Dead cell | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Control (n = 118) | Day 1 | 80 | 67.79 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8.47 |
| Day 2 | 8 | 6.77 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 11.86 | |
| Day 3 | 6 | 5.08 | 19 | 16.1 | 18 | 15.25 | |
| Day 4 | 2 | 1.69 | 60 | 50.84 | 30 | 25.42 | |
| Study (n = 92) | Day 1 | 47 | 51.08 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 17.39 |
| Day 2 | 7 | 7.6 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 | |
| Day 3 | 3 | 3.26 | 4 | 4.34 | 30 | 32.6 | |
| Day 4 | 3 | 3.26 | 23 | 25 | 38 | 41.3 | |
p < 0.05 vs. Control in Dead cell groups,
p < 0.05 vs. Control in Two-cell groups,
p < 0.05 vs. Control in Blastocyst groups.
Figure 4Stereomicroscope imaging of the fetus in KSOM medium the second day after IVF: A) Evolution of embryos is favorable in the control group; B) mbryos in the study groups represent two-cell arrest; after arrest, the two-cell embryo will degenerate and experience fragmentation.
Figure 5Stereomicroscope imaging of the blastocysts (one day after irradiation) in KSOM medium 4th day after IVF: A) A large number of embryos progress to the blastocyst stage and had no morphological abnormalities; B) A large number of embryos is arrested at the one- to two-cell stage and some of them became degenerated and experienced cytoplasmic vacuolization, fragmentation, and cell death with abnormal and pyknotic appearance.
Effects of one day and thirty-five days after the last MRI irradiation on the quality of the two-cell embryos in the control and study groups
| Groups | 1 day after irradiation | 35 days after irradiation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Study | Control | Study | ||
| Grade A | n | 87 | 86 | 71 | |
| % | 72.50 | 71.66 | 59.16 | ||
| Grade B | n | 15 | 17 | 21 | |
| % | 12.50 | 14.17 | 17.50 | ||
| Grade C | n | 10 | 18 | 8 | 13 |
| % | 8.33 | 15.00 | 6.67 | 10.84 | |
| Grade D | n | 8 | 9 | 15 | |
| % | 6.67 | 7.50 | 12.50 | ||
p < 0.05 vs. Control, 1 day after irradiation
Morphological data of embryo in the control and study groups one day and thirty-five days after the last MRI irradiation
| Measurements (μm) | 1 day after irradiation | 35 days after irradiation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Study | Control | Study | |
| Total fetal diameter | 147.82 ± 0.12 | 145.36 ± 1.45 | 140.70 ± 0.78 | |
| Cytoplasm diameter | 120.45 ± 0.54 | 117.34 ± 0.62 | 114.04 ± 1.16 | |
| Zona pellucida thickness | 19.14 ± 0.85 | 16.79 ± 1.06 | 19.03 ± 1.36 | 16.74 ± 0.44 |
| Perivitelline space diameter | 8.64 ± 0.06 | 8.58 ± 0.42 | 8.76 ± 0.35 | |
p < 0.05 vs. Control, 1 day after irradiation
Quantitative data of embryo cleavage in control and study groups thirty-five days after MRI irradiation
| Groups/Days | Two-cell | Blastocyst | Dead cell | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Control (n = 67) | Day 1 | 48 | 71.64 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5.97 |
| Day 2 | 3 | 4.47 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8.95 | |
| Day 3 | 2 | 2.98 | 8 | 11.94 | 12 | 17.91 | |
| Day 4 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 56.71 | 27 | 40.29 | |
| Study (n = 71) | Day 1 | 46 | 64.78 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8.45 |
| Day 2 | 6 | 8.45 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14.08 | |
| Day 3 | 3 | 4.22 | 6 | 8.45 | 18 | 25.35 | |
| Day 4 | 1 | 1.4 | 37 | 52.11 | 31 | 43.66 | |