Literature DB >> 2695510

The effect of mutations in the SOS response on the kinetics of quinolone killing.

R N Walters1, L J Piddock, R Wise.   

Abstract

The SOS response is induced in Escherichia coli by agents that damage DNA, such as quinolone antibiotics. It has been proposed that induction of the SOS response by these agents may have a role in the mechanism of quinolone action. SOS mutants derived from Escherichia coli AB1157 were investigated by susceptibility testing and killing kinetic studies at various quinolone concentrations to determine whether SOS response induction was protective or damaging to quinolone-treated bacteria. Susceptibility testing showed some differences between the SOS mutants, but killing kinetic studies demonstrated further differences, some of which could be explained with respect to the SOS phenotype. The effect of ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid on the mutants cannot be explained with respect to the SOS phenotype, although the presence of a defective SOS response makes the bacteria less sensitive to the action of these agents. Evidence is provided that the induction of the SOS response may be protective to fleroxacin and enoxacin treated bacteria. These results suggest that quinolones may not have a common mechanism of action, as was first thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2695510     DOI: 10.1093/jac/24.6.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  9 in total

Review 1.  The mode of action of quinolones: the paradox in activity of low and high concentrations and activity in the anaerobic environment.

Authors:  C S Lewin; I Morrissey; J T Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Medium plays a role in determining expression of acrB, marA, and soxS in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Andrew M Bailey; Mark A Webber; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Gene expression changes triggered by exposure of Haemophilus influenzae to novobiocin or ciprofloxacin: combined transcription and translation analysis.

Authors:  H Gmuender; K Kuratli; C P Gray; W Keck; S Evers
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Correlation of quinolone MIC and inhibition of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis and induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L J Piddock; R N Walters; J M Diver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of Bay y3118 against quinolone-susceptible and -resistant gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  L J Piddock; A J Marshall; Y F Jin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Mode of action of the new quinolones: new data.

Authors:  D C Hooper; J S Wolfson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Bactericidal activities of five quinolones for Escherichia coli strains with mutations in genes encoding the SOS response or cell division.

Authors:  L J Piddock; R N Walters
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clinically relevant mutant DNA gyrase alters supercoiling, changes the transcriptome, and confers multidrug resistance.

Authors:  Mark A Webber; Vito Ricci; Rebekah Whitehead; Meha Patel; Maria Fookes; Alasdair Ivens; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 9.  Antimicrobial Resistance and Food Animals: Influence of Livestock Environment on the Emergence and Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Nikola Vidovic; Sinisa Vidovic
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.