Literature DB >> 26954893

Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.

Woldeyesus Sinebo1, Karim Maredia2.   

Abstract

The regulation of genetically modified (GM) crops is a topical issue in agriculture and environment over the past 2 decades. The objective of this paper is to recount regulatory and adoption practices in some developing countries that have successfully adopted GM crops so that aspiring countries may draw useful lessons and best practices for their biosafatey regulatory regimes. The first 11 mega-GM crops growing countries each with an area of more than one million hectares in 2014 were examined. Only five out of the 11 countries had smooth and orderly adoption of these crops as per the regulatory requirement of each country. In the remaining 6 countries (all developing countries), GM crops were either introduced across borders without official authorization, released prior to regulatory approval or unapproved seeds were sold along with the approved ones in violation to the existing regulations. Rapid expansion of transgenic crops over the past 2 decades in the developing world was a result of an intense desire by farmers to adopt these crops irrespective of regulatory roadblocks. Lack of workable biosafety regulatory system and political will to support GM crops encouraged unauthorized access to GM crop varieties. In certain cases, unregulated access in turn appeared to result in the adoption of substandard or spurious technology which undermined performance and productivity. An optimal interaction among the national agricultural innovation systems, biosafety regulatory bodies, biotech companies and high level policy makers is vital in making a workable regulated progress in the adoption of GM crops. Factoring forgone opportunities to farmers to benefit from GM crops arising from overregulation into biosafety risk analysis and decision making is suggested. Building functional biosafety regulatory systems that balances the needs of farmers to access and utilize the GM technology with the regulatory imperatives to ensure adequate safety to the environment and human health is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GM crops adoption history; biosafety regulation; functional biosafety systems; unauthorized release

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26954893      PMCID: PMC5033216          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1151989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  15 in total

1.  Illegal Bt cotton in India haunts regulators.

Authors:  K S Jayaraman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Illegal seeds overtake India's cotton fields.

Authors:  K S Jayaraman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Engineering Crops to Resist Weed Killers: Plants that resist herbicides could, be a boon to chemical companies; a prototype may soon be field tested.

Authors:  M Sun
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  USDA approves next-generation GM potato.

Authors:  Emily Waltz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases.

Authors:  Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  Transgenics: A new breed.

Authors:  Daniel Cressey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops.

Authors:  Chidananda Nagamangala Kanchiswamy; Daniel James Sargent; Riccardo Velasco; Massimo E Maffei; Mickael Malnoy
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 19.536

8.  Letter: Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules.

Authors:  P Berg; D Baltimore; H W Boyer; S N Cohen; R W Davis; D S Hogness; D Nathans; R Roblin; J D Watson; S Weissman; N D Zinder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Prospects in plant genetic engineering.

Authors:  K A Barton; W J Brill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India.

Authors:  Jonas Kathage; Matin Qaim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regulation of genome edited technologies in India.

Authors:  Murali Krishna Chimata; Gyanesh Bharti
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  The Search for Resistance to Cassava Mosaic Geminiviruses: How Much We Have Accomplished, and What Lies Ahead.

Authors:  Vincent N Fondong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Crop Biotechnology and Product Stewardship.

Authors:  Ruth Mbabazi; Muffy Koch; Karim Maredia; Joseph Guenthner
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.