Literature DB >> 26954576

Granular biochar compared with activated carbon for wastewater treatment and resource recovery.

Tyler M Huggins1, Alexander Haeger1, Justin C Biffinger2, Zhiyong Jason Ren3.   

Abstract

Granular wood-derived biochar (BC) was compared to granular activated carbon (GAC) for the treatment and nutrient recovery of real wastewater in both batch and column studies. Batch adsorption studies showed that BC material had a greater adsorption capacity at the high initial concentrations of total chemical oxygen demand (COD-T) (1200 mg L(-1)), PO4 (18 mg L(-1)), and NH4 (50 mg L(-1)) compared to GAC. Conversely the BC material showed a lower adsorption capacity for all concentrations of dissolved chemical oxygen demand (COD-D) and the lower concentrations of PO4 (5 mg L(-1)) and NH4 (10 mg L(-1)). Packed bed column studies showed similar average COD-T removal rate for BC with 0.27 ± 0.01 kg m(-3) d(-1) and GAC with 0.24 ± 0.01 kg m(-3) d(-1), but BC had nearly twice the average removal rate (0.41 ± 0.08 kg m(-3) d(-3)) compared to GAC during high COD-T concentrations (>500 mg L(-1)). Elemental analysis showed that both materials accumulated phosphorous during wastewater treatment (2.6 ± 0.4 g kg(-1) and 1.9 ± 0.1 g kg(-1) for BC and GAC respectively). They also contained high concentrations of other macronutrients (K, Ca, and Mg) and low concentrations of metals (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, and Cu). The good performance of BC is attributed to its macroporous structure compared with the microporous GAC. These favorable treatment data for high strength wastewater, coupled with additional life-cycle benefits, helps support the use of BC in packed bed column filters for enhanced wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activated carbon; Biochar; Nutrient recovery; Sustainability; Wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26954576     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  13 in total

1.  Wheat straw biochar reduces environmental cadmium bioavailability.

Authors:  Liqiang Cui; Matt R Noerpel; Kirk G Scheckel; James A Ippolito
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Mixed phase nano-CdS supported on activated biomass carbon as efficient visible light-driven photocatalysts.

Authors:  Feng-Ying Cai; Yu-Qing Zhang; Jun-Tao Wang; Jun-Ru Zhou; Hai-Lei Cao; Jian Lü
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biochar and activated carbon act as promising amendments for promoting the microbial debromination of tetrabromobisphenol A.

Authors:  Emilie Lefèvre; Nathan Bossa; Courtney M Gardner; Gretchen E Gehrke; Ellen M Cooper; Heather M Stapleton; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on biochar sorbent modified by metal incorporation.

Authors:  Nurul Azrin Zubbri; Abdul Rahman Mohamed; Naoto Kamiuchi; Maedeh Mohammadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Nitrifying trickling filters and denitrifying bioreactors for nitrogen management of high-strength anaerobic digestion effluent.

Authors:  Aaron A Forbis-Stokes; Lucas Rocha-Melogno; Marc A Deshusses
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 6.  A Review of Non-Soil Biochar Applications.

Authors:  Mattia Bartoli; Mauro Giorcelli; Pravin Jagdale; Massimo Rovere; Alberto Tagliaferro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Evaluation of Lead (Pb(II)) Removal Potential of Biochar in a Fixed-bed Continuous Flow Adsorption System.

Authors:  Pushpita Kumkum; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  A granular activated carbon/electrochemical hybrid system for onsite treatment and reuse of blackwater.

Authors:  Tate W Rogers; Tess S Rogers; Mikayla H Stoner; Katelyn L Sellgren; Brendon J Lynch; Aaron A Forbis-Stokes; Brian R Stoner; Brian T Hawkins
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 9.  Progress and prospects of applying carbon-based materials (and nanomaterials) to accelerate anaerobic bioprocesses for the removal of micropollutants.

Authors:  Ana Rita Silva; Maria Madalena Alves; Luciana Pereira
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Facile preparation of magnetic porous carbon monolith from waste corrugated cardboard box for solar steam generation and adsorption.

Authors:  Yuhui Ma; Junrui Cao
Journal:  Biomass Convers Biorefin       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.