| Literature DB >> 26953895 |
Roberto Antonicelli1, Liana Spazzafumo2, Simonetta Scalvini3, Fabiola Olivieri4,5, Maria Vittoria Matassini6, Gianfranco Parati7,8, Donatella Del Sindaco9, Raffaella Gallo10, Fabrizia Lattanzio11.
Abstract
Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) experience progressive deterioration of functional capacity and quality of life (QoL). This prospective, randomized, controlled trial assesses the effect of exercise training (ET) protocol on functional capacity, rehospitalization, and QoL in CHF patients older than 70 years compared with a control group. A total of 343 elderly patients with stable CHF (age, 76.90±5.67, men, 195, 56.9%) were randomized to ET (TCG, n=170) or usual care (UCG, n=173). The ET protocol involved supervised training sessions for 3 months in the hospital followed by home-telemonitored sessions for 3 months. Assessments, performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months, included: ECG, resting echocardiography, NT-proBNP, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, and comprehensive geriatric assessment with the InterRAI-HC instrument. As compared to UCG, ET patients at 6 months showed: i) significantly increased 6MWT distance (450±83 vs. 290±97 m, p=0.001); ii) increased ADL scores (5.00±2.49 vs. 6.94±5.66, p=0.037); iii) 40% reduced risk of rehospitalisation (hazard ratio=0.558, 95%CI, 0.326-0.954, p=0.033); and iv) significantly improved perceived QoL (28.6±12.3 vs. 44.5±12.3, p=0.001). In hospital and home-based telemonitored exercise confer significant benefits on the oldest CHF patients, improving functional capacity and subjective QoL and reducing risk of rehospitalisation.Entities:
Keywords: 6MWT; QoL; chronic heart failure; elderly CHF patients; physical exercise; quality of life
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26953895 PMCID: PMC4931840 DOI: 10.18632/aging.100901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1The flow of the 426 consecutive CHF patients enrolled for the study. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups studied
| TCG | UCG | Total | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.21±5.21 | 77.60±6.02 | 76.90±5.67 | 0.145 | |
| 103 (60.6%) | 92 (53.2%) | 195 (56.9%) | 0.166 | |
| 26.6±4.4 | 25.1±5.5 | 26.8±4.6 | 0.031 | |
| 127.1±15.6 | 124.9±16.2 | 126.0±16.0 | 0.423 | |
| 71.2±9.4 | 73.6±11.2 | 72.3±10.3 | 0.168 | |
| 299±120 | 270±120 | 285±121 | 0.153 | |
| 47.9±13.3 | 49.0±13.4 | 48.4±13.4 | 0.166 | |
| 42.0±14.9 | 46.8±16.8 | 44.3±16.0 | 0.074 | |
| 1236 (2038) | 618 (520) | 806 (820) | 0.110 | |
| 170 (100%) | 156 (90%) | 326 (95%) | <0.001 |
Variable was log transformed,
median (interval).
BMI: body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres (kg/m2); LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction; 6MWT: Six Minute Walk Test; MLHFQ: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; NT-proBNP: N-terminal portion of brain-type natriuretic peptide. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group. Informal support services: child or child-in-law, other relative, spouse or partner, and friend/neighbour. Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD and categorical data as number and percentage.
6MWT distance in TCG and UCG patients
| TCG | UCG | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 299±120 | 270±120 | <0.001 | |
| 380.7±120.3 | 300.6±125.7 | ||
| 394.1±123.6 | 301.2±125.8 | ||
ANOVA for repeated measures. T0: baseline; T1: 3-month follow-up; T2: 6-month follow-up; 6MWT: Six Minute Walk Test; MLHFQ: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire; NT-proBNP: N-terminal portion of brain-type natriuretic peptide. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group. Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD and categorical data as number and percentage.
Effect of exercise on hospitalization (Cox model)
| TCG (n=150) | UCG (n=163) | P | HR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 (15.2%) | 60 (36.8%) | <0.001 | 2.91 (1.70-4.97) |
TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group.
Effect of exercise on hospitalization, adjusted for clinical covariates
| B | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.583 | ||||
| −0.017 | 0.983 | 0.932-1.036 | 0.524 | |
| 0.129 | 1.138 | 0.652-1.985 | 0.650 | |
| −0.003 | 0.997 | 0.934-1.063 | 0.917 | |
| 0.023 | 1.023 | 0.965-1.084 | 0.446 | |
| −0.061 | ||||
| −0.002 | ||||
| 0.004 | 1.004 | 0.989-1.018 | 0.630 |
B= beta coefficient. BMI=body mass index; ADL=activities of daily living. IADL=Instrumental activities of daily living. 6MWT=6 Minute Walk Test; MLHFQ=Minnesota Living with the Heart Failure Questionnaire. HR=hazard ratio. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group.
Figure 2aEffect of exercise training and usual care on rehospitalization
Cox model adjusted for age, gender, BMI, 6MWT distance, ADL, IADL, and QoL score. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group.
Figure 2bEffect of usual care and exercise training on rehospitalization
Decision-tree analysis developed by CHAID (Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector) to assess the risk of rehospitalization including dichotomized variables such as age, gender, BMI, 6MWT distance, ADL, IADL and QoL score as predictors. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group. P value adj. = p-value of the chi-square test, adjusted by Bonferroni's correction. DF = degree of freedom.
Change in secondary endpoints (MLHFQ and NT-proBNP) at 3 months and 6 months in the two groups
| TCG | UCG | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42.0±14.9 | 46.8±16.8 | ||
| 29.9±9.8 | 34.7±9.3 | ||
| 28.6±12.3 | 44.5±12.3 | ||
| 1236 (2038)§ | 618 (520)§ | ||
| 350 (137) | 290 (241) | ||
| 440 (208) | 2143 (1638) | ||
ANOVA for repeated measures. T0: baseline; T1: 3-month follow-up; T2: 6-month follow-up; MLHFQ: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; NT-proBNP: N-terminal portion of brain-type natriuretic peptide. TCG=training care group; UCG=usual care group.