Literature DB >> 26953726

Graft selection strategy in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: When both hemiliver grafts meet volumetric criteria.

Takeshi Kurihara1, Tomoharu Yoshizumi1, Yoshihiro Yoshida1, Toru Ikegami1, Shinji Itoh1, Norifumi Harimoto1, Mizuki Ninomiya1, Hideaki Uchiyama1, Hirohisa Okabe1, Koichi Kimura1, Hirofumi Kawanaka1,2, Ken Shirabe1, Yoshihiko Maehara1.   

Abstract

To ensure donor safety in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the left and caudate lobe (LL) is the preferred graft choice. However, patient prognosis may still be poor even if graft volume (GV) selection criteria are met. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of right lobe (RL) donation when the LL graft selection criteria are met. Consecutive donors (n = 135) with preoperative LL graft volumetric GV/standard liver volume (SLV) of ≥35% and RL remnant of ≥35% were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups: LL graft and RL graft. Recipient's body surface area (BSA), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and the donor's age were higher in the RL group. The donor's BSA and preoperative volumetric GV/SLV of the LL graft were smaller in the RL group. The predicted score (calculated using data for graft size, donor age, MELD score, and the presence of portosystemic shunt, which correlated well with graft function and with 6-month graft survival) of the RL group, was significantly lower if the LL graft were used, but using the actual RL graft improved the score equal to that of the LL group. Six-month and 12-month graft survival rates did not differ between the 2 groups. In patients with a poor prognosis, a larger RL graft improved the predicted score and survival was equal to that of patients who received LL grafts. In conclusion, graft selection by GV, donor age, and recipient MELD score improves outcomes in LDLT. Liver Transplantation 22 914-922 2016 AASLD.
© 2016 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953726     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of right-lobe and left-lobe living-donor liver transplantations using small-for-size grafts.

Authors:  Wong Hoi She; Kenneth Sh Chok; James Yy Fung; Albert Cy Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Predictor of outcome after living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Japan criteria.

Authors:  Yusuke Yonemura; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Shoichi Inokuchi; Yukiko Kosai-Fujimoto; Noboru Harada; Shinji Itoh; Takeo Toshima; Kazuki Takeishi; Shohei Yoshiya; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-04-24

3.  A novel and simple formula to predict liver mass in porcine experimental models.

Authors:  Lilia Martínez de la Maza; Verónica Prado; Amelia J Hessheimer; Javier Muñoz; Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas; Constantino Fondevila
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Liver Graft-to-Spleen Volume Ratio as a Useful Predictive Factor of the Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Lin Wei; Wei Qu; Zhi-Gui Zeng; Li-Ying Sun; Ying Liu; Hai-Ming Zhang; Yu-Le Tan; Jun Wang; Zhi-Jun Zhu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Bilateral proficiency over time leads to reduced donor morbidity in living donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Viola Huang; Chao-Long Chen; Yu-Hung Lin; Tsan-Shiun Lin; Chih-Che Lin; Shih-Ho Wang; Chee-Chien Yong; Chih-Yi Chen; Yu-Fan Cheng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.