Literature DB >> 26953669

Is There an Association Between Pain and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?

Jakob M Burgstaller1, Peter J Schüffler2, Joachim M Buhmann2, Gustav Andreisek3, Sebastian Winklhofer3, Filippo Del Grande3,4, Michèle Mattle1, Florian Brunner5, Georgios Karakoumis6, Johann Steurer1, Ulrike Held1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective multicenter cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify an association between pain and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: At present, the relationship between abnormal MRI findings and pain in patients with LSS is still unclear.
METHODS: First, we conducted a systematic literature search. We identified relationships of relevant MRI parameters and pain in patients with LSS. Second, we addressed the study question with a thorough descriptive and graphical analysis to establish a relationship between MRI parameters and pain using data of the LSS outcome study (LSOS).
RESULTS: In the systematic review including four papers about the associations between radiological findings in the MRI and pain, the authors of two articles reported no association and two of them did. Of the latters, only one study found a moderate correlation between leg pain measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the degree of stenosis assessed by spine surgeons. In the data of the LSOS study, we could not identify a relevant association between any of the MRI parameters and buttock, leg, and back pain, quantified by the Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Even by restricting the analysis to the level of the lumbar spine with the most prominent radiological "stenosis," no relevant association could be shown.
CONCLUSION: Despite a thorough analysis of the data, we were not able to prove any correlation between radiological findings (MRI) and the severity of pain. There is a need for innovative "methods/techniques" to learn more about the causal relationship between radiological findings and the patients' pain-related complaints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953669     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Ulrike Held; Mazda Farshad; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Texture analysis of paraspinal musculature in MRI of the lumbar spine: analysis of the lumbar stenosis outcome study (LSOS) data.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Pacifico; D O'Riordan; S Nauer; M von Büren; C Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlate with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Chaxiang Chen; Zhichao Lin; Yingjie Zhang; Zemin Chen; Shujie Tang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.

Authors:  Yeon-Jee Ko; Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Chi Young Park; Jungheum Cho; Yusuhn Kang; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex-Dependent Differences in Symptom-Related Disability Due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Raffael Peteler; Paul Schmitz; Martin Loher; Petra Jansen; Joachim Grifka; Achim Benditz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) study: protocol for an inception cohort study.

Authors:  Sean D Rundell; Ayumi Saito; Eric N Meier; Stephanie T Danyluk; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Kelley Seebeck; Janna L Friedly; Patrick J Heagerty; Sandra K Johnston; Monica Smersh; Maggie E Horn; Pradeep Suri; Amy M Cizik; Adam P Goode
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Magnitude of Dural Tube Compression Still Does Not Show a Predictive Value for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis for Six-Year Follow-Up: A Longitudinal Observation Study in the Community.

Authors:  Koji Otani; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Takuya Nikaido; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  Diagnostic confounders of chronic widespread pain: not always fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Serge Perrot; Claudia Sommer; Yoram Shir; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-04-30

10.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression in Elderly Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphological Analysis.

Authors:  Seungman Ha; Youngho Hong; Seungcheol Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.