Literature DB >> 26952886

Neural correlates for aesthetic appraisal of pictograph and its referent: An fMRI study.

Wei Zhang1, Siyan Lai1, Xianyou He2, Xueru Zhao1, Shuxian Lai3.   

Abstract

As one kind of language symbols, pictograph has a graphical structure based on its referential object. Are the aesthetic qualities of these referential objects reflected in the cognitive and neural processing of the font structure of pictographs? In this present study, participants performed aesthetic judgments on both pictographs and their referential object images whilst acquiring fMRI data. Square luminance judgment was served as baseline to control for activity in motor brain regions associated with the key responses. Behavioral results showed both font structures of pictographs and their corresponding object images which refer to beautiful objects were rated significantly higher on beauty than those refer to ugly objects. Functional MRI revealed regions of occipital lobe, frontal lobe and inferior orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) that were commonly activated for pictographs and object images referring to beautiful objects in the direct contrasts between beautiful judgment and luminance judgment. Moreover, only the aesthetic judgments of beauty for the pictographs but not the object images elicited activation of motor areas, which implied relevant embodied experience was elicited during the aesthetic perception of novel pictographs. In contrast, activities associated with pictographs referring to ugly objects were limited to visual processing regions of the bilateral inferior occipital gyri, which could be due to the intentions of avoiding ugly or aversive stimulus. In addition, object images were associated with broader recruitment in cortical areas than pictographs, likely due to the increased visual processing demands for the more visually complex object images. These findings indicate that aesthetic perceptions for the font structures of pictographs were derived from their referential objects, which could arouse a similar sense of beauty supported by common neural mechanisms with other aesthetic objects.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic appraisal and judgment; Neuroaesthetics; Object image; Pictograph; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26952886     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Medial prefrontal cortex involvement in aesthetic appreciation of paintings: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Ivan Alekseichuk; Andrea Antal; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-10-21

Review 2.  What is Beauty?

Authors:  Andrea Sisti; Payam Sadeghi; Negaar Aryan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Neural correlates of appreciating natural landscape and landscape garden: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xianyou He; Sizhe Liu; Ting Li; Jinhui Li; Xiaoxiang Tang; Shuxian Lai
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Neuroanatomical correlates of self-awareness of highly practiced visuomotor skills.

Authors:  Junjun Li; Zhenglong Lin; Ran Tao; Min Xu; Shihong Kong; Hong-Yan Bi; Yang Yang
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Neural substrates of embodied natural beauty and social endowed beauty: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xianyou He; Siyan Lai; Juan Wan; Shuxian Lai; Xueru Zhao; Darong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Experience of Beauty of Chinese Poetry and Its Neural Substrates.

Authors:  Chunhai Gao; Cheng Guo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-21

7.  The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Xueru Zhao; Junjing Wang; Jinhui Li; Guang Luo; Ting Li; Anjan Chatterjee; Wei Zhang; Xianyou He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.