Literature DB >> 26952471

Correlation between porous texture and cell seeding efficiency of gas foaming and microfluidic foaming scaffolds.

Marco Costantini1, Cristina Colosi2, Pamela Mozetic3, Jakub Jaroszewicz4, Alessia Tosato2, Alberto Rainer3, Marcella Trombetta3, Wojciech Święszkowski4, Mariella Dentini2, Andrea Barbetta5.   

Abstract

In the design of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, morphological parameters such as pore size, shape, and interconnectivity, as well as transport properties, should always be tailored in view of their clinical application. In this work, we demonstrate that a regular and ordered porous texture is fundamental to achieve an even cell distribution within the scaffold under perfusion seeding. To prove our hypothesis, two sets of alginate scaffolds were fabricated using two different technological approaches of the same method: gas-in-liquid foam templating. In the first one, foam was obtained by insufflating argon in a solution of alginate and a surfactant under stirring. In the second one, foam was generated inside a flow-focusing microfluidic device under highly controlled and reproducible conditions. As a result, in the former case the derived scaffold (GF) was characterized by polydispersed pores and interconnects, while in the latter (μFL), the porous structure was highly regular both with respect to the spatial arrangement of pores and interconnects and their monodispersity. Cell seeding within perfusion bioreactors of the two scaffolds revealed that cell population inside μFL scaffolds was quantitatively higher than in GF. Furthermore, seeding efficiency data for μFL samples were characterized by a lower standard deviation, indicating higher reproducibility among replicates. Finally, these results were validated by simulation of local flow velocity (CFD) inside the scaffolds proving that μFL was around one order of magnitude more permeable than GF.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioreactor; Cell seeding efficiency; Microfluidic foaming; Porous scaffolds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26952471     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of scaffold microstructure and comparison of cell seeding methods using micro-computed tomography-based tools.

Authors:  Aleksi Palmroth; Sanna Pitkänen; Markus Hannula; Kaarlo Paakinaho; Jari Hyttinen; Susanna Miettinen; Minna Kellomäki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  The Overview of Porous, Bioactive Scaffolds as Instructive Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration and Their Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Gaëtan Lutzweiler; Albana Ndreu Halili; Nihal Engin Vrana
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Micro-CT - a digital 3D microstructural voyage into scaffolds: a systematic review of the reported methods and results.

Authors:  Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 4.  Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Youwen Yang; Guoyong Wang; Huixin Liang; Chengde Gao; Shuping Peng; Lida Shen; Cijun Shuai
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 5.  Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration.

Authors:  Lisha Zhu; Dan Luo; Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.344

6.  The importance of factorial design in tissue engineering and biomaterials science: Optimisation of cell seeding efficiency on dermal scaffolds as a case study.

Authors:  Alexandra Levin; Vaibhav Sharma; Lilian Hook; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 7.  Microfluidics Mediated Production of Foams for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Ilham Maimouni; Cesare M Cejas; Janine Cossy; Patrick Tabeling; Maria Russo
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Bone Regeneration Capability of 3D Printed Ceramic Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang; Seok-Jin Hong; Hyo-Geun Choi; Sun-Ju Byeon; Ho-Kyung Lim; Sung-Min Chung; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Natural-Based Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair.

Authors:  Benedetta E Fornasari; Giacomo Carta; Giovanna Gambarotta; Stefania Raimondo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-16

10.  3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Lim; Seok-Jin Hong; Sun-Ju Byeon; Sung-Min Chung; Sung-Woon On; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.