Mélanie Levasseur1, Hélène Lefebvre2, Marie-Josée Levert2, Joanie Lacasse-Bédard3, Johanne Desrosiers4, Pierre-Yves Therriault5, André Tourigny6, Yves Couturier4, Hélène Carbonneau5. 1. Research Centre on Aging, Eastern Townships Integrated University Centre for Health & Social Services-Sherbrooke Hospital University Centre, 1036, Belvedere Street South, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 4C4, Canada; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada. Electronic address: Melanie.Levasseur@USherbrooke.ca. 2. Université de Montréal & Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Canada. 3. Research Centre on Aging, Eastern Townships Integrated University Centre for Health & Social Services-Sherbrooke Hospital University Centre, 1036, Belvedere Street South, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 4C4, Canada. 4. Université de Sherbrooke & Research Centre on Aging, Canada. 5. Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières & Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Canada. 6. Université Laval & Institut sur le Vieillissement et la Participation Sociale des Aînés, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social participation, a determinant of health in older adults, requires innovative interventions. The personalised citizen assistance for social participation (APIC) involves weekly three-hour personalised stimulation sessions targeting significant social and leisure activities difficult to accomplish. Recently adapted for older adults, the APIC's impact on this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the impact of APIC on older adults with disabilities. METHODS: A mixed-method design including a pre-experimental component was used with 16 participants (11 women) aged 66-91 (79.4±8.7) with disabilities, living at home. They completed functional autonomy, social participation, leisure and quality of life questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: APIC increased older adults' functional autonomy (p=0.02), accomplishment (p<0.01) and satisfaction (p=0.02) with social participation, and frequency of leisure practice (p<0.01). Post-intervention, participants wished to modify the practice (p<0.01) and frequency (p<0.01) of leisure activities, and difficulties in their social environment diminished (p=0.03). Their attitude toward leisure (p=0.04) as well as their health (p<0.01) and psychological (p=0.03) quality of life improved. Older adults thought APIC helped them resume, maintain, explore and experiment with significant social activities. It also increased their psychological and physical well-being, feeling of control, connectedness, self-esteem and motivation to accomplish activities. Finally, APIC can compensate for an unavailable and crumbling social network. CONCLUSION: APIC is a promising intervention that leads to new opportunities for older adults to increase community integration and enhance the social component of their lives. It can also optimise how the needs of older adults are met, including utilisation of personal and environmental resources. Crown
BACKGROUND:Social participation, a determinant of health in older adults, requires innovative interventions. The personalised citizen assistance for social participation (APIC) involves weekly three-hour personalised stimulation sessions targeting significant social and leisure activities difficult to accomplish. Recently adapted for older adults, the APIC's impact on this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the impact of APIC on older adults with disabilities. METHODS: A mixed-method design including a pre-experimental component was used with 16 participants (11 women) aged 66-91 (79.4±8.7) with disabilities, living at home. They completed functional autonomy, social participation, leisure and quality of life questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: APIC increased older adults' functional autonomy (p=0.02), accomplishment (p<0.01) and satisfaction (p=0.02) with social participation, and frequency of leisure practice (p<0.01). Post-intervention, participants wished to modify the practice (p<0.01) and frequency (p<0.01) of leisure activities, and difficulties in their social environment diminished (p=0.03). Their attitude toward leisure (p=0.04) as well as their health (p<0.01) and psychological (p=0.03) quality of life improved. Older adults thought APIC helped them resume, maintain, explore and experiment with significant social activities. It also increased their psychological and physical well-being, feeling of control, connectedness, self-esteem and motivation to accomplish activities. Finally, APIC can compensate for an unavailable and crumbling social network. CONCLUSION: APIC is a promising intervention that leads to new opportunities for older adults to increase community integration and enhance the social component of their lives. It can also optimise how the needs of older adults are met, including utilisation of personal and environmental resources. Crown
Authors: H W Donkers; D J Van der Veen; S Teerenstra; M J Vernooij-Dassen; M W G Nijhuis-Vander Sanden; M J L Graff Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Mélanie Levasseur; Daniel Naud; Jean-François Bruneau; Mélissa Généreux Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390