Literature DB >> 2695232

Embryonic lens induction: more than meets the optic vesicle.

M S Saha1, C L Spann, R M Grainger.   

Abstract

The classic model of lens induction stipulated that the optic vesicle is both a necessary and sufficient inductor of the lens in amphibian development. Although this view has subsequently been modified to encompass the contributions of earlier inductors, such as the involuting endo-mesoderm, it is still widely reported that the optic vesicle alone is able to elicit lens formation from ectoderm. Recent work, which has employed a host- and donor-marking scheme, has shown the optic vesicle to be a weak inductor of the lens, involved only in the final rather than the initial phases of determination. In addition, a review of the literature substantiates this conclusion since many of the transplantation experiments arguing for the sufficiency of the optic vesicle are characterized by the lack of adequate criteria for judging the authenticity of the resulting lens responses, particularly the absence of a host- and donor-marking strategy. This analysis of the literature, together with our own results, lead us to propose a new model of lens determination in which tissue interactions during gastrulation are required to confer a lens-forming bias upon a large area of head ectoderm allowing the optic vesicle to induce lens formation in a defined area of this primed ectoderm. Data from studies on mesoderm and neural induction are also beginning to suggest a multistep model involving the initial establishment of bias and subsequent interactions resulting in determination, and we propose that this framework will serve as a general paradigm for embryonic induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2695232     DOI: 10.1016/0922-3371(89)90001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Differ Dev        ISSN: 0922-3371


  9 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of optic vesicle development: complexities, ambiguities and controversies.

Authors:  Ruben Adler; M Valeria Canto-Soler
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Localisation of glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans during early eye development in the macaque.

Authors:  P E Peterson; C S Pow; D B Wilson; A G Hendrickx
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The function of FGF signaling in the lens placode.

Authors:  Claudia M Garcia; Jie Huang; Bhavani P Madakashira; Ying Liu; Ramya Rajagopal; Lisa Dattilo; Michael L Robinson; David C Beebe
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  The pattern of protein and glycoprotein synthesis in presumptive lens and non-lens ectoderm of the chicken embryo.

Authors:  Charles H Sullivan; Joseph P Hart; Jana Kramer
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1991-06

5.  A Toolbox to Study Tissue Mechanics In Vivo and Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Sofia Moreira; Jaime A Espina; Joana E Saraiva; Elias H Barriga
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  BMP4 is essential for lens induction in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Y Furuta; B L Hogan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  The optic vesicle promotes cornea to lens transdifferentiation in larval Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Stefano M Cannata; Sergio Bernardini; Sergio Filoni; Cesare Gargioli
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Neural crest cells organize the eye via TGF-β and canonical Wnt signalling.

Authors:  Timothy Grocott; Samuel Johnson; Andrew P Bailey; Andrea Streit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Neurally Derived Tissues in Xenopus laevis Embryos Exhibit a Consistent Bioelectrical Left-Right Asymmetry.

Authors:  Vaibhav P Pai; Laura N Vandenberg; Douglas Blackiston; Michael Levin
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 5.443

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.