| Literature DB >> 26951985 |
Jun-Gu Kang1, Sungjin Ko1, Heung-Chul Kim2, Sung-Tae Chong2, Terry A Klein3, Jeong-Byoung Chae1, Yong-Sun Jo1, Kyoung-Seong Choi4, Do-Hyeon Yu5, Bae-Keun Park6, Jinho Park7, Joon-Seok Chae1.
Abstract
Deer serve as reservoirs of tick-borne pathogens that impact on medical and veterinary health worldwide. In the Republic of Korea, the population of Korean water deer (KWD, Hydropotes inermis argyropus) has greatly increased from 1982 to 2011, in part, as a result of reforestation programs established following the Korean War when much of the land was barren of trees. Eighty seven Haemaphysalis flava, 228 Haemaphysalis longicornis, 8 Ixodes nipponensis, and 40 Ixodes persulcatus (21 larvae, 114 nymphs, and 228 adults) were collected from 27 out of 70 KWD. A total of 89/363 ticks (266 pools, 24.5% minimum infection rate) and 5 (1.4%) fed ticks were positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum using nested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and groEL genes, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene fragment sequences of 88/89 (98.9%) of positive samples for A. phagocytophilum corresponded to previously described gene sequences from KWD spleen tissues. The 16S rRNA gene fragment sequences of 20/363 (5.5%) of the ticks were positive for A. bovis and were identical to previously reported sequences. Using the ITS specific nested PCR, 11/363 (3.0%) of the ticks were positive for Bartonella spp. This is the first report of Anaplasma and Bartonella spp. detected in ticks collected from KWD, suggesting that ticks are vectors of Anaplasma and Bartonella spp. between reservoir hosts in natural surroundings.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma spp.; Bartonella spp.; Korean water deer; tick
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26951985 PMCID: PMC4792329 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.1.87
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic relationships for Anaplasma phagocytophilum (bold letters) detected from ticks collected from Korean water deer and Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species based on partial nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA gene fragments (926 bp). The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing the phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes are the proportions of 1,000 bootstrap iterations that support the topology shown.
Fig. 2.Phylogenetic relationships for Bartonella grahamii and Bartonella spp. (bold letters) detected from ticks collected from Korean water deer and Bartonella spp. based on partial nucleotide sequences of ITS gene fragments (484 bp). The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing the phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes are the proportions of 1,000 bootstrap iterations that support the topology shown.
Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in fed ticks collected from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) in the ROK using 16S rRNA primer sets
| Species | Stage | No. of pools (no. of ticks) | No. of PCR-positive samples (prevalence [%][ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double infection[ | Double infection[ | Triple infection[ | ||||||
| Larva | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nymph | 8 (10) | 3 (30.0) | 0 | 2 (20.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Male | 47 (47) | 14 (29.8) | 3 (6.4) | 1 (2.1) | 3 (6.4) | 0 | 0 | |
| Female | 29 (29) | 13 (44.8) | 2 (6.9) | 2 (6.9) | 1 (3.4) | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 85 (87) | 30 (34.5) | 5 (5.8) | 5 (5.8) | 4 (4.6) | 0 | 0 | |
| Larva | 2 (19) | 2 (10.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nymph | 26 (104) | 8 (7.7) | 1 (1.0) | 2 (1.9) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
| Male | 45 (45) | 7 (15.6) | 2 (4.5) | 0 | 1 (2.2) | 0 | 0 | |
| Female | 60 (60) | 21 (35.0) | 9 (15.0) | 3 (5.0) | 5 (8.3) | 1 (1.7) | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 133 (228) | 38 (16.7) | 12 (5.3) | 5 (2.2) | 7 (3.0) | 2 (0.9) | 0 | |
| Male | 5 (5) | 1 (20.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Female | 3 (3) | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 8 (8) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 0 | |
| Larva | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Male | 15 (15) | 8 (53.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Female | 24 (24) | 10 (41.7) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.2) | 0 | 1 (4.2) | |
| Subtotal | 40 (40) | 18 (45.0) | 2 (5.0) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 1 (2.5) | |
| Total | Larva | 4 (21) | 2 (9.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nymph | 34 (114) | 11 (9.6) | 1 (0.9) | 4 (3.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Male | 112 (112) | 30 (26.8) | 5 (4.5) | 1 (0.9) | 4 (3.6) | 0 | 0 | |
| Female | 116 (116) | 46 (39.7) | 14 (12.1) | 6 (5.2) | 9 (7.8) | 0 | 1 (0.9) | |
| Total | 266 (363) | 89 (24.5) | 20 (5.5) | 11 (3.0) | 13 (3.6) | 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.3) | |
PCR-positive pathogens was calculated by minimum infection rate (MIR), number of positive pools/total number of individual ticks tested.
Two adult ticks assayed separately demonstrated a double infection with A. phagocytophilum and A. bovis.
Two adult ticks assayed separately demonstrated a double infection with A. phagocytophilum and Bartonella spp.
One adult tick demonstrated a triple infection with A. phagocytophilum, A. bovis, and Bartonella spp.