Literature DB >> 26951945

Assessment of the Rate of Adherence to International Guidelines for Androgen Deprivation Therapy with External-beam Radiation Therapy: A Population-based Study.

Paolo Dell'Oglio1, Hiba Abou-Haidar2, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah3, Zhe Tian4, Alessandro Larcher5, Giorgio Gandaglia5, Nicola Fossati5, Shahrokh F Shariat6, Umberto Capitanio5, Alberto Briganti5, Francesco Montorsi5, Markus Graefen7, Fred Saad8, Pierre I Karakiewicz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Association of Urology guidelines recommend using radiation therapy (RT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to treat high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of adherence to these guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2003 and 2009, in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, 14 180 patients were diagnosed with high-risk (T1-T2 with World Health Organization histologic grade 3) or locally advanced (T3-T4 with any histologic grade) prostatic adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTION: Administration of RT-ADT versus RT alone. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed the rate of adherence to guidelines with respect to use of RT-ADT in the overall population and after stratification according to stage-grade groupings (T1-T2 G3 vs T3-T4 any grade), age (66-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 yr), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (0, 1, ≥2), and preexisting baseline cardiovascular (CV) disease. We depicted the rate of RT-ADT administration graphically over the study period. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the predictors of RT-ADT use. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: RT-ADT rates and guideline adherence were 58-75%, with the highest rate (75%) in 2003 and the lowest (58%) in 2009. When stratified according to stage-grade groupings, age, CCI, and preexisting baseline CV disease, similar results were obtained. In multivariable analyses, year of diagnosis (p<0.001), patient age (p<0.001), stage-grade groupings (p<0.001), CCI (p=0.036), race (p<0.001), marital status (p<0.001), population density (p<0.001), and US regions (p<0.001) were independent predictors of RT-ADT use. The limitations of our study include age >65 yr and exclusive Medicare coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of guideline adherence regarding the use of RT-ADT is suboptimal and decreases with time instead of increasing. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This population-based study provides evidence of low adherence to international urologic guidelines regarding the combination of radiation therapy (RT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Despite the increasing number of randomized controlled trials over time that showed a survival benefit for patients with high-risk and locally advanced PCa treated with RT-ADT compared with RT alone, the rate of adherence to guidelines decreased with time.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-risk prostate cancer; Locally advanced prostate cancer; RT-ADT; SEER-Medicare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951945     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

1.  [Guideline adherence - is more always better?].

Authors:  M J Nothacker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Suboptimal use of hormonal therapy among German men with localized high-risk prostate Cancer during 2005 to 2015: analysis of registry data.

Authors:  Semaw Ferede Abera; Ahmed Bedir; André Glowka; Dirk Vordermark; Daniel Medenwald
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Next-generation prostate cancer risk calculator for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Robert K Nam; Raj Satkunavisam; Joseph L Chin; Jonathan Izawa; John Trachtenberg; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Rajiv Singal; Christopher Sherman; Linda Sugar; Kevin Chagin; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Racial disparities in receipt of standard chemoradiation in anal squamous cell carcinoma, an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Shelly X Bian; Dennis H Chen; Eugene Lin
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Detailed Evaluation of Androgen Deprivation Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer Patients Compared to the European Association of Urology Guidelines Using Long-term Data from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam.

Authors:  Renée Hogenhout; Ivo I de Vos; Sebastiaan Remmers; Lionne D F Venderbos; Martijn B Busstra; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-02

6.  Efficacy characteristics of different therapeutic modalities for locally advanced prostate cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jianxin Xue; Yi Wang; Yuxiao Zheng; Jianzhong Zhang; Feng Qi; Hong Cheng; Shuhui Si; Ran Li; Xiao Li; Zhiqiang Qin; Bin Yu; Qing Zou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.