H G Schmidt1, Tamara Van Gog1, Stephanie Ce Schuit2, Kees Van den Berge3, Paul L Van Daele2, Herman Bueving4, Tim Van der Zee1, Walter W Van den Broek5, Jan L Van Saase2, Sílvia Mamede5. 1. Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, The Netherlands. 4. Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Literature suggests that patients who display disruptive behaviours in the consulting room fuel negative emotions in doctors. These emotions, in turn, are said to cause diagnostic errors. Evidence substantiating this claim is however lacking. The purpose of the present experiment was to study the effect of such difficult patients' behaviours on doctors' diagnostic performance. METHODS: We created six vignettes in which patients were depicted as difficult (displaying distressing behaviours) or neutral. Three clinical cases were deemed to be diagnostically simple and three deemed diagnostically complex. Sixty-three family practice residents were asked to evaluate the vignettes and make the patient's diagnosis quickly and then through deliberate reflection. In addition, amount of time needed to arrive at a diagnosis was measured. Finally, the participants rated the patient's likability. RESULTS:Mean diagnostic accuracy scores (range 0-1) were significantly lower for difficult than for neutral patients (0.54 vs 0.64; p=0.017). Overall diagnostic accuracy was higher for simple than for complex cases. Deliberate reflection upon the case improved initial diagnostic, regardless of case complexity and of patient behaviours (0.60 vs 0.68, p=0.002). Amount of time needed to diagnose the case was similar regardless of the patient's behaviour. Finally, average likability ratings were lower for difficult than for neutral-patient cases. CONCLUSIONS:Disruptive behaviours displayed by patients seem to induce doctors to make diagnostic errors. Interestingly, the confrontation with difficult patients does however not cause the doctor to spend less time on such case. Time can therefore not be considered an intermediary between the way the patient is perceived, his or her likability and diagnostic performance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Literature suggests that patients who display disruptive behaviours in the consulting room fuel negative emotions in doctors. These emotions, in turn, are said to cause diagnostic errors. Evidence substantiating this claim is however lacking. The purpose of the present experiment was to study the effect of such difficult patients' behaviours on doctors' diagnostic performance. METHODS: We created six vignettes in which patients were depicted as difficult (displaying distressing behaviours) or neutral. Three clinical cases were deemed to be diagnostically simple and three deemed diagnostically complex. Sixty-three family practice residents were asked to evaluate the vignettes and make the patient's diagnosis quickly and then through deliberate reflection. In addition, amount of time needed to arrive at a diagnosis was measured. Finally, the participants rated the patient's likability. RESULTS: Mean diagnostic accuracy scores (range 0-1) were significantly lower for difficult than for neutral patients (0.54 vs 0.64; p=0.017). Overall diagnostic accuracy was higher for simple than for complex cases. Deliberate reflection upon the case improved initial diagnostic, regardless of case complexity and of patient behaviours (0.60 vs 0.68, p=0.002). Amount of time needed to diagnose the case was similar regardless of the patient's behaviour. Finally, average likability ratings were lower for difficult than for neutral-patient cases. CONCLUSIONS: Disruptive behaviours displayed by patients seem to induce doctors to make diagnostic errors. Interestingly, the confrontation with difficult patients does however not cause the doctor to spend less time on such case. Time can therefore not be considered an intermediary between the way the patient is perceived, his or her likability and diagnostic performance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision making; Diagnostic errors; Medical education
Authors: Wolf E Hautz; Juliane E Kämmer; Stefanie C Hautz; Thomas C Sauter; Laura Zwaan; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Tanja Birrenbach; Volker Maier; Martin Müller; Stefan K Schauber Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Laurence Klenk; Christina von Rütte; Jonathan F Henssler; Thomas C Sauter; Wolf E Hautz; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Martin Müller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ibrahim Al Alwan; Mohi Eldin Magzoub; Ali Al Haqwi; Motasin Badri; Sarah M Al Yousif; Amir Babiker; Sílvia Mamede; Henk G Schmidt Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Ahmed Al Rumayyan; Nasr Ahmed; Reem Al Subait; Ghassan Al Ghamdi; Moeber Mohammed Mahzari; Tarig Awad Mohamed; Jerome I Rotgans; Mustafa Donmez; Silvia Mamede; Henk G Schmidt Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2018-04