Literature DB >> 26951385

Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone of poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study.

Bing Zhao1,2, Xianxi Tan1, Hua Yang3, Kuang Zheng1, Zequn Li1, Ye Xiong1, Ming Zhong1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular coiling is a valid treatment option for poor-grade ruptured aneurysms. However, little is known about stent-assisted coiling of poor-grade aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling with coiling alone for poor-grade aneurysms.
METHODS: Using multicenter data on poor-grade aneurysms, we performed a retrospective analysis of 131 consecutive patients treated with endovascular coiling within 14 days after ictus. Patients were split into two groups: stent-assisted coiling and coiling alone. Baseline characteristics, immediate angiographic results, perioperative complications, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Twenty-three (17.6%) patients were treated with stent-assisted coiling and 108 (82.4%) with coiling alone. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, clinical grade, Fisher grade, modified Fisher grade, aneurysm location, and size between the stent-assisted coiling and coiling alone groups. Intraprocedural aneurysm rupture, procedure-related ischemic complication, external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhagic complication, and symptomatic vasospasm did not differ between the two groups. Immediate angiographic results and clinical outcomes at discharge and at 6 and 12 months did not differ between the groups. Aneurysm rebleeding occurred in 4 (17.4%) patients after stent-assisted coiling compared with 2 (1.9%) patients after coiling alone (p<0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that incomplete aneurysm occlusion was independently associated with aneurysm rebleeding (p=0.016), and there was a trend toward aneurysm rebleeding after stent-assisted coiling (p=0.051).
CONCLUSIONS: Stent-assisted coiling of poor-grade aneurysms is feasible and safe compared with coiling alone. However, the hemorrhagic complication and aneurysm rebleeding may not be negligible. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Coil; Complication; Stent

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951385     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  10 in total

1.  The Woven EndoBridge device for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: international multicenter experience and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Harker; Robert W Regenhardt; Naif M Alotaibi; Justin Vranic; Faith C Robertson; Adam A Dmytriw; Jerry C Ku; Matthew Koch; Christopher J Stapleton; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Nelson Serna; Boris Pabon; Juan A Mejia; Aman B Patel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Sbt van Rooij; M E Sprengers; J P Peluso; J Daams; D Verbaan; W J van Rooij; C B Majoie
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Risk factors for intraprocedural rupture during emergency endovascular treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Wei Shang; Xiaoting Chang; Xiaotong Wang; Jun Li; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.764

4.  Different Hemodynamic Characteristics and Resulting in Different Risks of Rupture Between Wide-Neck and Narrow-Neck Aneurysms.

Authors:  Heng Wei; Qi Tian; Kun Yao; Jianfeng Wang; Peibang He; Yujia Guo; Wenrui Han; Wenhong Gao; Mingchang Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Safety of stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of wide-necked ruptured aneurysm: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prevalence.

Authors:  Shadi Bsat; Ayman Bsat; Hani Tamim; Hani Chanbour; Safwan Omar Alomari; Mohamad Nabih El Houshiemy; Charbel Moussalem; Ibrahim Omeis
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  The safety and outcomes of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms with incomplete occlusion after coiling: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jianhe Yue; Yuan Xie; Xiaolin Zhang; Yongxiang Jiang; Weifu Chen; Ying Ma; Yuan Cheng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: comparison of LVIS stents with laser-cut stents.

Authors:  Gaici Xue; Qiao Zuo; Xiaoxi Zhang; Haishuang Tang; Rui Zhao; Qiang Li; Yibin Fang; Pengfei Yang; Bo Hong; Yi Xu; Qinghai Huang; Jianmin Liu
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2021-03-03

8.  Stent-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm: a multicenter prospective registry study (SAVE).

Authors:  Gaozhi Li; Yongquan Han; Shenghao Ding; Yaohua Pan; Xiaohua Zhang; Bing Zhao
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Woven EndoBridge device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of clinical and angiographic results.

Authors:  Yong Xie; Huan Tian; Bin Xiang; Jian Liu; Hua Xiang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 1.764

10.  Surface anatomy for implantation of external ventricular drainage: Some surgical remarks.

Authors:  Kevyan Mostofi; Reza K Khouzani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-08-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.