Literature DB >> 2695130

Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide compared with imipramine in depressive disorder (DSM-III): an Austrian double-blind, multicentre study.

U Baumhackl1, K Bizière, R Fischbach, C Geretsegger, G Hebenstreit, E Radmayr, M Stabl.   

Abstract

The antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, and safety of moclobemide, a reversible, monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, were compared with those of imipramine in parallel groups of patients with a major depressive episode, in a 4-week, multicentre (17 centres), randomised study. A total of 381 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment; they were not required to avoid tyramine-rich foods. Drop-out rates were comparable in both groups at about 17%. Judged primarily on the HRSD, no significant differences in efficacy were observed between the groups, but the number of patients presenting with adverse events, as well as the total number of adverse events, was greater with imipramine. Cardiovascular tolerability was satisfactory and physical examination, body weight, and laboratory values were essentially unaffected in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2695130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl        ISSN: 0960-5371


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar depression: management options.

Authors:  Gin S Malhi; Philip B Mitchell; Shahzad Salim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Antidepressant therapy in the chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  S Lynch; R Seth; S Montgomery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 2: Review, Grading of the Evidence, and a Precise Algorithm.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Lakshmi Yatham; Heinz Grunze; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Pierre Blier; Siegfried Kasper; Hans Jurgen Moeller
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 4.  Level of response and safety of pharmacological monotherapy in the treatment of acute bipolar I disorder phases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorge M Tamayo; Carlos A Zarate; Eduard Vieta; Gustavo Vázquez; Mauricio Tohen
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.176

5.  Moclobemide versus fluoxetine for a major depressive episode.

Authors:  C Reynaert; M Parent; J Mirel; P Janne; L Haazen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Efficacy of moclobemide in different patient groups: a meta-analysis of studies.

Authors:  J Angst; M Stabl
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Risk-benefit assessment of newer versus older monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors.

Authors:  Y Lecrubier
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moclobemide and imipramine in the treatment of depression in Indian patients.

Authors:  Ajit Avasthi; Parmanand Kulhara; Gagandeep Singh; Rajni Sharma; Rajinder P Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.