Literature DB >> 2695129

A double-blind comparative trial of moclobemide v. imipramine and placebo in major depressive episodes.

M Versiani1, U Oggero, P Alterwain, R Capponi, F Dajas, G Heinze-Martin, C A Marquez, M A Poleo, L E Rivero-Almanzor, L Rossel.   

Abstract

Patients (n = 490) suffering from a major depressive episode according to DSM-III criteria were randomly allocated to groups receiving either moclobemide, imipramine, or placebo treatment. Subjects were treated as out-patients for 6 weeks. On overall assessment of efficacy and on results of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, both moclobemide and imipramine were superior to placebo, but the differences between moclobemide and imipramine were not significant. Premature termination due to insufficient efficacy was more frequent with placebo than with moclobemide or with imipramine, these differences being significant. The overall assessment of tolerance clearly favoured placebo and moclobemide over imipramine. This was also reflected in the frequency of premature terminations due to poor tolerance, as well as in the frequency of adverse events, which were highest in the imipramine group. The only cardiovascular finding was an increase of the mean heart rate with imipramine, maximum at the end of week 1, while placebo and moclobemide displayed no relevant changes. There were no other important drug-related changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2695129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl        ISSN: 0960-5371


  9 in total

1.  The International Multicenter Clinical Trial Group on Moclobemide in Social Phobia. Moclobemide in social phobia. A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Monoamine oxidase A inhibitor occupancy during treatment of major depressive episodes with moclobemide or St. John's wort: an [11C]-harmine PET study.

Authors:  Julia Sacher; Sylvain Houle; Jun Parkes; Pablo Rusjan; Sandra Sagrati; Alan A Wilson; Jeffrey H Meyer
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide compared with fluvoxamine in depressive disorder (DSM III). A French/Swiss double-blind trial.

Authors:  T Bougerol; C Uchida; J P Gachoud; M Köhler; H Mikkelsen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Sona Dimidjian; Jay D Amsterdam; Richard C Shelton; Jan Fawcett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Moclobemide versus fluoxetine for a major depressive episode.

Authors:  C Reynaert; M Parent; J Mirel; P Janne; L Haazen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Efficacy of moclobemide in different patient groups: a meta-analysis of studies.

Authors:  J Angst; M Stabl
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Risk-benefit assessment of newer versus older monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors.

Authors:  Y Lecrubier
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  A risk-benefit assessment of moclobemide in the treatment of depressive disorders.

Authors:  T R Norman; G D Burrows
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moclobemide and imipramine in the treatment of depression in Indian patients.

Authors:  Ajit Avasthi; Parmanand Kulhara; Gagandeep Singh; Rajni Sharma; Rajinder P Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.