Literature DB >> 26951214

Good eggs? Evaluating consent forms for egg donation.

Alana Rose Cattapan.   

Abstract

Beyond gaps in the provision of information, the informed consent process for egg donation is complicated by conflicts of interest, payment and a lack of longitudinal data about physiological and psychological risks. Recent scholarship has suggested that egg donation programmes could improve the informed consent process by revising consent documents. At a minimum, these documents should include information about eight key criteria: the nature and objectives of treatment; the benefits, risks and inconveniences of egg donation; the privacy of donors and their anonymity (where applicable); disclosure that participation is voluntary (withdrawal); the availability of counselling; financial considerations; the possibility of an unsuccessful cycle and potential uses of the eggs retrieved. This study evaluates the incorporation of these minimum criteria in consent forms for egg donation, obtained through requests to Canadian fertility clinics. Even when clinics were considered to have met criteria simply by mentioning them, among the eight consent forms assessed, none met the minimum standards. Only half of clinics addressed privacy/anonymity concerns, financial issues and the possibility of a future cycle. Improving the quality of consent documentation to meet the minimum standards established by this study may not be an onerous task. For some, this will include re-evaluating how they include one or two elements of disclosure, and for others, this will require a substantial overhaul. Using the criteria provided by this study as the minimum standard for consent could ensure that donors have the basic information they need to make informed decisions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Keywords:  Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues; In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer; Informed Consent; Reproductive Medicine; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951214     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18

3.  How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Gillian Crawford; Claire Salter; Michael Parker; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Is it acceptable to contact an anonymous egg donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child?

Authors:  Rachel Horton; Benjamin Bell; Angela Fenwick; Anneke M Lucassen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.