Literature DB >> 26950926

Improved cerebrospinal fluid suppression for intracranial vessel wall MRI.

Huan Yang1, Xuefeng Zhang2,3, Qin Qin2,4, Li Liu2, Bruce A Wasserman2, Ye Qiao2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and assess a three-dimensional (3D) high resolution black blood MRI (BBMRI) method for evaluation of intracranial vessels with improved cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anti-driven-equilibrium (ADE) pulse was incorporated into a variable flip-angle TSE-based 3D BBMRI to improve CSF suppression. ADE-BBMRI was optimized in 8 participants and compared with BBMRI, with acquired 0.5 mm isotropic resolution and scan time of 5.4 min at 3 Tesla. Contrast-enhanced ADE-BBMRI protocol was implemented in nine patients with intracranial atherosclerosis. Signal and morphological measurements were compared between ADE-BBMRI and BBMRI, as well as pre- and postcontrast ADE-BBMRI. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlations (ICC).
RESULTS: ADE-BBMRI effectively suppressed the surrounding CSF signal of intracranial vessels, with a 36-44% reduction compared with BBMRI. ADE-BBMRI also reduced the overall wall signal by 8-8.5%, but provided a significant improvement in wall-to-CSF contrast-to-noise ratio over BBMRI (middle cerebral artery, 5.93 ± 0.59 versus 3.95 ± 1.67, P < 0.01; basilar artery, 3.8 ± 1.76 versus 1.34 ± 0.54, P = 0.01, respectively). No differences were noted in morphological measurements between ADE-BBMRI and BBMRI (lumen area, 6.35 ± 2.87 versus 6.32 ± 2.84 mm(2) ; wall area, 1.28 ± 0.52 versus 1.27 ± 0.53 mm(2) ; mean wall thickness, 0.93 ± 0.30 versus 0.93 ± 0.32 mm; maximum wall thickness, 1.27 ± 0.33 versus 1.28 ± 0.36 mm, all P > 0.05). Contrast enhanced ADE-BBMRI improved the plaque delineation by the increased wall signal, wall-to-CSF and wall-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratio. ICC ranged from 0.54 to 0.95.
CONCLUSION: The 3D ADE-BBMRI provides excellent blood and CSF suppression, and accurate measurements of intracranial vessels at 0.5 mm isotropic resolution in 5 min. Its clinical application may provide insight into stroke risk. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:665-672.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; MRI; intracranial; isotropic; vessel wall

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26950926     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current Clinical Applications of Intracranial Vessel Wall MR Imaging.

Authors:  Raghav R Mattay; Jose F Saucedo; Vance T Lehman; Jiayu Xiao; Emmanuel C Obusez; Scott B Raymond; Zhaoyang Fan; Jae W Song
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 2.  Vessel Wall MR Imaging in the Pediatric Head and Neck.

Authors:  Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Chengcheng Zhu; Lei Wu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.376

3.  MR Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Brianna F Moon; Morgan P Burke; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Mark A Elliott; Haochang Shou; Steven R Messé; Scott E Kasner; Laurie A Loevner; Mitchell D Schnall; John E Kirsch; Walter R Witschey; Zhaoyang Fan
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Variable impact of CSF flow suppression on quantitative 3.0T intracranial vessel wall measurements.

Authors:  Petrice M Cogswell; Jeroen C W Siero; Sarah K Lants; Spencer Waddle; L Taylor Davis; Guillaume Gilbert; Jeroen Hendrikse; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Gadolinium Enhancement of the Aneurysm Wall in Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms.

Authors:  C J H C M van Laarhoven; M L Rots; V E C Pourier; N K N Jorritsma; T Leiner; J Hendrikse; M D I Vergouwen; G J de Borst
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Comparison of 3T Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI Sequences.

Authors:  A Lindenholz; A A Harteveld; J J M Zwanenburg; J C W Siero; J Hendrikse
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Utility of minimum intensity projection images based on three-dimensional CUBE T1 weighted imaging for evaluating middle cerebral artery stenosis.

Authors:  Yejun Wu; Fangbing Li; Yilin Wang; Tianxiang Hu; Liang Xiao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Neural network enhanced 3D turbo spin echo for MR intracranial vessel wall imaging.

Authors:  Zechen Zhou; Shuo Chen; Niranjan Balu; Baocheng Chu; Xihai Zhao; Jie Sun; Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Thomas Hatsukami; Peter Börnert; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Prognostic value of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating carotid atherosclerotic plaque in patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jin-Er Shu; Ming-Liang Ying; Xiao-Rong Chen; Jian-Jun Hua; Jie-Ting Fu; Xiu-Mei Xia; Yong-Hao Pan; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  T2-Weighted Whole-Brain Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging at 3 Tesla With Cerebrospinal Fluid Suppression.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Yanjie Zhu; Yulong Qi; Liwen Wan; Lijie Ren; Yi Zhu; Na Zhang; Dong Liang; Ye Li; Hairong Zheng; Xin Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.