Literature DB >> 26950769

Choice of baseline climate data impacts projected species' responses to climate change.

David J Baker1, Andrew J Hartley2, Stuart H M Butchart3,4, Stephen G Willis1.   

Abstract

Climate data created from historic climate observations are integral to most assessments of potential climate change impacts, and frequently comprise the baseline period used to infer species-climate relationships. They are often also central to downscaling coarse resolution climate simulations from General Circulation Models (GCMs) to project future climate scenarios at ecologically relevant spatial scales. Uncertainty in these baseline data can be large, particularly where weather observations are sparse and climate dynamics are complex (e.g. over mountainous or coastal regions). Yet, importantly, this uncertainty is almost universally overlooked when assessing potential responses of species to climate change. Here, we assessed the importance of historic baseline climate uncertainty for projections of species' responses to future climate change. We built species distribution models (SDMs) for 895 African bird species of conservation concern, using six different climate baselines. We projected these models to two future periods (2040-2069, 2070-2099), using downscaled climate projections, and calculated species turnover and changes in species-specific climate suitability. We found that the choice of baseline climate data constituted an important source of uncertainty in projections of both species turnover and species-specific climate suitability, often comparable with, or more important than, uncertainty arising from the choice of GCM. Importantly, the relative contribution of these factors to projection uncertainty varied spatially. Moreover, when projecting SDMs to sites of biodiversity importance (Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas), these uncertainties altered site-level impacts, which could affect conservation prioritization. Our results highlight that projections of species' responses to climate change are sensitive to uncertainty in the baseline climatology. We recommend that this should be considered routinely in such analyses.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Sub-Saharan Africa; change factor method; downscaling; general circulation models; important bird and biodiversity areas; satellite remote sensing; species distribution model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26950769     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Uncertainty of future projections of species distributions in mountainous regions.

Authors:  Ying Tang; Julie A Winkler; Andrés Viña; Jianguo Liu; Yuanbin Zhang; Xiaofeng Zhang; Xiaohong Li; Fang Wang; Jindong Zhang; Zhiqiang Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The use of climate information to estimate future mortality from high ambient temperature: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Michael Sanderson; Katherine Arbuthnott; Sari Kovats; Shakoor Hajat; Pete Falloon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prediction of Arctic plant phenological sensitivity to climate change from historical records.

Authors:  Zoe A Panchen; Root Gorelick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Assessing agreement among alternative climate change projections to inform conservation recommendations in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  R Travis Belote; Carlos Carroll; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Julia Michalak; John W Williams; Matthew A Williamson; Gregory H Aplet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Patterns and biases in an Arctic herbarium specimen collection: Implications for phenological research.

Authors:  Zoe A Panchen; Jennifer Doubt; Heather M Kharouba; Mark O Johnston
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change.

Authors:  Mark A Titley; Stuart H M Butchart; Victoria R Jones; Mark J Whittingham; Stephen G Willis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identifying Ancient Settlement Patterns through LiDAR in the Mosquitia Region of Honduras.

Authors:  Christopher T Fisher; Juan Carlos Fernández-Diaz; Anna S Cohen; Oscar Neil Cruz; Alicia M Gonzáles; Stephen J Leisz; Florencia Pezzutti; Ramesh Shrestha; William Carter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Potential worldwide distribution of Fusarium dry root rot in common beans based on the optimal environment for disease occurrence.

Authors:  Renan Macedo; Lilian Patrícia Sales; Fernanda Yoshida; Lidianne Lemes Silva-Abud; Murillo Lobo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Risk of biodiversity collapse under climate change in the Afro-Arabian region.

Authors:  Alaaeldin Soultan; Martin Wikelski; Kamran Safi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evaluating multiple historical climate products in ecological models under current and projected temperatures.

Authors:  Giancarlo Sadoti; Stephanie A McAfee; E Fleur Nicklen; Pamela J Sousanes; Carl A Roland
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.