Literature DB >> 26949588

Management of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia Associated with Petroclival Meningioma.

Shyamal C Bir1, Tanmoy Kumar Maiti1, Papireddy Bollam1, Anil Nanda1.   

Abstract

Objective Petroclival meningioma (PM) presents with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in < 5% of cases. Neurosurgeons often face the dilemma of formulating a treatment protocol when TN recurs. In this study, we sought to set up a protocol in patients with PM who had a recurrent TN. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of 57 patients with PM. Of the 57 patients, only 7 patients presented with TN, and six patients experienced recurrent TN. The study population was evaluated clinically and radiographically after treatment. Results Overall improvement of pain control after various treatments was 67%, and tumor control was 100%. The pain-free period was 2 years for the Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) group and 4 years for the resection group when treated as a primary treatment (p = 0.034). Of the six patients, four patients had Barrow Neurosurgical Institute (BNI) score I (no TN, no medication), and two patients had BNI score III (some pain controlled with medication). The Karnofsky performance scale score was significantly improved after treatment compared with the pretreated status (78 versus 88; p = 0.044). Conclusion Microsurgical resection is superior to GKRS in achieving and maintaining pain-free status in patients with recurrent trigeminal pain associated with PM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  management; outcome; petroclival meningioma; recurrent trigeminal neuralgia

Year:  2015        PMID: 26949588      PMCID: PMC4777616          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  23 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular decompression.

Authors:  W Jeffrey Elias; Kim J Burchiel
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Concerning the mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  W J GARDNER
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Motor cortex stimulation: functional magnetic resonance imaging-localized treatment for three sources of intractable facial pain.

Authors:  Darian R Esfahani; Marc T Pisansky; Rima M Dafer; Douglas E Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Prospective comparison of posterior fossa exploration and stereotactic radiosurgery dorsal root entry zone target as primary surgery for patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock; Kimberly A Schoeberl
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia: a clinical and anatomical study.

Authors:  P J Hamlyn; T T King
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  [Comprehensive radiographic diagnosis of breast cancer].

Authors:  A N Zaĭtsev; A G Vesnin; V F Semiglazov; A A Orlov; M F Chernomordikova; I A Chebykin
Journal:  Vopr Onkol       Date:  1996

7.  Microvascular decompression vs. gamma knife radiosurgery for typical trigeminal neuralgia: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Ronald Brisman
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Effect of the Gamma Knife on trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  J Régis; L Manera; H Dufour; D Porcheron; R Sedan; J C Peragut
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  A prospective cohort study of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn; Jose Peñagaricano
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia. A prospective study of 100 cases.

Authors:  M J Arias
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiosurgery vs. microsurgery for newly diagnosed, small petroclival meningiomas with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Hun Ho Park; Woo Hyun Kim; Hyun-Ho Jung; Jong Hee Chang; Kyu-Sung Lee; Won Seok Chang; Chang-Ki Hong
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Lorenzo Giammattei; P di Russo; D Starnoni; T Passeri; M Bruneau; T R Meling; M Berhouma; G Cossu; J F Cornelius; D Paraskevopoulos; I Zazpe; E Jouanneau; L M Cavallo; V Benes; V Seifert; M Tatagiba; H W S Schroeder; T Goto; K Ohata; O Al-Mefty; T Fukushima; M Messerer; R T Daniel; S Froelich
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Aggressive Progression of a WHO Grade I Meningioma of the Posterior Clinoid Process: An Illustration of the Risks Associated With Observation of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Isabella M Young; Jacky Yeung; Chad Glenn; Charles Teo; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Drilling off the Petrosal Apex and Opening the Upper Wall of Meckel's Cave Are the Key Elements of Good Outcomes in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Petrous Apex Meningioma.

Authors:  Jie Bai; Yufan Zhou; Gang Song; Jian Ren; Xinru Xiao
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.