Miguel Anaya1, Juan F Galisteo-López1, Mauricio E Calvo1, Cefe López2, Hernán Míguez1. 1. Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-Universidad de Sevilla , C/Américo Vespucio 49, 41092 Sevilla, Spain. 2. Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) , C/Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
In this work we demonstrate that the different processes occurring during hybrid organic-inorganic lead iodide perovskite film formation can be identified and analyzed by a combined in situ analysis of their photophysical and structural properties. Our observations indicate that this approach permits unambiguously identifying the crystal nucleation and growth regimes that lead to the final material having a cubic crystallographic phase, which stabilizes to the well-known tetragonal phase upon cooling to room temperature. Strong correlation between the dynamic and static photoemission results and the temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction data allows us to provide a description and to establish an approximate time scale for each one of the stages and their evolution. The combined characterization approach herein explored yields key information about the kinetics of the process, such as the link between the evolution of the defect density during film formation, revealed by a fluctuating photoluminescence quantum yield, and the gradual changes observed in the PbI2-related precursor structure.
In this work we demonstrate that the different processes occurring during hybrid organic-inorganic lead iodide perovskite film formation can be identified and analyzed by a combined in situ analysis of their photophysical and structural properties. Our observations indicate that this approach permits unambiguously identifying the crystal nucleation and growth regimes that lead to the final material having a cubic crystallographic phase, which stabilizes to the well-known tetragonal phase upon cooling to room temperature. Strong correlation between the dynamic and static photoemission results and the temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction data allows us to provide a description and to establish an approximate time scale for each one of the stages and their evolution. The combined characterization approach herein explored yields key information about the kinetics of the process, such as the link between the evolution of the defect density during film formation, revealed by a fluctuating photoluminescence quantum yield, and the gradual changes observed in the PbI2-related precursor structure.
Ever since the first evidence that hybrid
organic–inorganic
lead-halide perovskites could outperform all other solution process
approaches to fabricate photovoltaic devices,[1−5] strong research efforts have been directed mainly
in two directions: looking for the best solar-cell configuration (with
recent reports pointing to performances rapidly approaching that of
well established single crystal silicon cells[6]) and exploring more fundamental questions, essential to translating
the current perovskite solar cell rush into a well-established technology.
The latter includes the nature of photoexcited species, stability
of the material under operating conditions, the reproducibility of
efficiency measurements, the synthesis of the material, and so on.[7,8] Regarding its synthesis, a number of approaches have been explored
to prepare high-quality perovskite films ranging from vacuum evaporation[9,10] to solution process techniques.[11−13] Among the latter, spin
coating is the most widespread approach representing the best compromise
between material quality, feasibility of mass-production, and low-cost
processing, leading to high-performance photovoltaic devices as well
as light-emitting ones with outstanding efficiency.[14]The morphology of the fabricated material (crystal
size distribution
and shape as well as their connectivity and final film texture), determining
its operation in both photovoltaic and emitting materials is strongly
determined by the growth process. In this respect, a number of articles[12,15−24] have recently studied the steps that link the initial precursors
to the final material during the solution process of organic–inorganic
lead halide perovskite (CH3NH3PbX3, where X corresponds to Cl, Br, or I) films. These studies, carried
out mainly from structural information concerning electron microscopy
images and X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments, have focused on different
aspects of the material formation. These include the effect of annealing
conditions,[15,20] and its rate,[16] the evolution of the crystallization process,[12,18,21,24] or the nature of the intermediate precursor species that precede
perovskite formation,[12,17,19,21,22] all of them
leading to the fabrication of samples with better crystalline quality.In this work we present a combined optical and structural study
comprising the time evolution of the photoluminescence (PL) spectra
and decay rates as well as the XRD collected in situ during the annealing
in air of CH3NH3PbI3 films just after
spin coating the precursors of the material. While only two stages
in material formation are evident from XRD data, its combination with
photophysical measurements reveals four different time intervals where
nucleation of crystallites and subsequent crystal growth seem to dominate.
Strong fluctuations in the PL quantum yield are evident throughout
the process and correlated with the evolution of PbI2-related
precursor species and sample morphology. A full time line for the
perovskite formation is proposed that could help to improve the material
quality by modifying the process at each of the different steps. Finally,
once the annealing process has come to an end, changes in the photophysical
and structural properties evidence a transition from the cubic to
the tetragonal crystalline phase upon cooling of the annealed material
to room temperature.
Experimental Details
Sample Preparation
CH3NH3PbI3 films were prepared following
a previously described approach[13] based
on a solvent-annealing crystallization
method.
Photophysical Characterization
After the 20 s spin
step ended samples were placed on top of a Peltier Cell set at 100
°C to carry out the photophysical study in an air atmosphere.
A black metal plate was placed between the cell and the sample to
avoid reflections of the pump beam. The sample was illuminated with
a pulsed femtosecond laser source (OPerA-Solo from Coherent, delivering
150 fs long pulses with a repetition rate of 1 kHz and a λ =
532 nm) focused with an achromatic 10 cm focal length lens producing
a spot size of 40 μm, which also acted as collection optics.
PL spectra were collected with a fiber-coupled spectrophotometer (USB4000
from Ocean Optics). Lifetime measurements were carried out using a
time-correlated single photon counting card (SPC-130 from Becker &
Hickl).
XRD Measurements
Temperature-controlled XRD measurements
were collected in a Philips X’pert PRO diffractometer with
a high-temperature chamber (ANTON PAAR HTK 1200) attached. Acquisition
of the samples was taken in the 5–20 2θ range with a
0.05 step in air atmosphere.
Results and Discussion
After annealing over a period of 90 min, the samples, comprising
films having large (over 1 μm dimensions in-plane) domains with
a thickness of 300 nm (see Figure S1),
present a strong PL peak centered at 770 nm. Lifetime measurements
were performed for an increasing pump power ranging from 10 nw to
2 μW, and the appropriate pump conditions were extracted to
ensure that we are in the monomolecular recombination regime (see Figure S2). Under these conditions recombination
dynamics are dominated by the filling of trap states associated with
the presence of defects.[25,26] Studying the photophysics
in this regime is relevant to take into account the role of defects
during the sample formation. Next we focused on the heating process
commonly used to anneal the perovskites. As a first step XRD data
were collected as a function of time while the sample was heated to
100 °C. Figure a,b shows data taken at two times of the heating process, 1 and 100
min after precursor deposition. This time interval allows the sample
to achieve a region where material formation seems complete and no
signs of degradation (such as the characteristic color change to yellow
or changes in the XRD or PL data) were observed. In the angular range
under consideration two peaks were studied: one around 2θ =
14° characteristic of the (110) planes of the tetragonal CH3NH3PbI3 phase or the (100) of the cubic
phase (detailed crystallographic information on the different CH3NH3PbI3 phases has been provided by
Baikie and coworkers[27]) and another just
below 2θ = 12° associated with intermediate PbI2-related precursor species, which will get consumed during perovskite
formation.[18] Both peaks appear highlighted
by arrows in the Figure. To follow the evolution of both species during
annealing we have extracted the intensity maxima of each peak as a
function of time.
Figure 1
XRD data of thin-film
perovskites collected at two points of the
annealing process: 1 (a) and 100 min (b) after precursor deposition.
Diffraction peaks associated with CH3NH3PbI3 and PbI2-related precursors are indicated with
arrows. Evolution of the intensity maximum of the XRD peak (c) corresponding
to CH3NH3PbI3 (black) and precursor
species (red circles) and angular position (d) as a function of anneal
time.
A trend similar to that presented by Unger
and coworkers[18] and Moore and coworkers[19] is observed, where a monotonic increase in the
CH3NH3PbI3 related peak is accompanied
by a drop in the
peak associated with the presence of the intermediate precursor species
(see Figure c). Such
trends indicate the formation of the perovskite species as the lead
precursor disappears. Ref (19) presents an analysis of this evolution from which they
extract the activation energy for the precursor-to-perovskite transition
but does not allow discerning between the nucleation and crystal growth
processes involved in the CH3NH3PbI3 formation. We have further extracted the angular position of the
peaks corresponding to the two species, a small shift in the position
being evident (Figure d). We shall come back to this point later on.XRD data of thin-film
perovskites collected at two points of the
annealing process: 1 (a) and 100 min (b) after precursor deposition.
Diffraction peaks associated with CH3NH3PbI3 and PbI2-related precursors are indicated with
arrows. Evolution of the intensity maximum of the XRD peak (c) corresponding
to CH3NH3PbI3 (black) and precursor
species (red circles) and angular position (d) as a function of anneal
time.To gain further knowledge into
the formation process we have studied
the photophysics of the samples during annealing. As a first step,
PL spectra were collected at different times of the process (T = 100 °C) while the sample was pumped with 500 nW.
Furthermore, for the power and small duty cycle associated with these
pump conditions no changes in intensity due to photoinduced processes[28] were observed. Figure a,b shows the spectral position and amplitude
of the PL peak as a function of anneal time. Here four different regimes
can be clearly observed. For a time interval (i) similar to that taken
by PbI2-related precursor species to disappear (ca. 15
min, see Figure c)
the PL peak remains fixed in spectral position but monotonically increases
its intensity. After a 10 min interval where the PL intensity slightly
decreases while maintaining its spectral position, stage (ii), the
PL further rises in amplitude and is accompanied by a red shift in
the peak. This period (iii) lasts nearly 30 min and then a final stage
is achieved (iv), which we identify with the end of the annealing
process. The time needed to reach this last stage is similar to previous
reports where the crystallization of the perovskite film was considered
completed.[12,18]
Figure 2
Time evolution during the annealing process of spectral
position
(a) and amplitude (b) of the PL peak and most frequent value of the
decay rate distribution (c). Four regimes corresponding to four different
perovskite film formation stages (see text) are separated by vertical
dashed lines.
Finally, we have performed
time-resolved measurements to obtain
the PL decay dynamics of the material during its formation in the
annealing process. Under the previously mentioned pump conditions
we are in the monomolecular recombination regime (see Figure S2) where the presence of defects determines
the dynamics of the PL and thus changes in the density of trap states
are expected to be reflected in the PL lifetime. Measurements were
carried out on different samples than those used for XRD although
under identical heating conditions to compare them. The dynamics of
the PL of the deposited samples were observed to strongly vary as
the annealing time increased (see Figure S3). To correlate these changes with those previously described, we
fitted the data to a decay rate distribution and extracted the most
frequent value for each annealing time (ΓMF). Figure c shows the time
evolution of the decay rates, where measurements were collected over
a period of 5 min to have enough signal. As for XRD data, PL decay
measurements were repeated on different samples and similar results
were obtained.Time evolution during the annealing process of spectral
position
(a) and amplitude (b) of the PL peak and most frequent value of the
decay rate distribution (c). Four regimes corresponding to four different
perovskite film formation stages (see text) are separated by vertical
dashed lines.During stage (i) the
monotonic increase in PL intensity (Figure b) coincides with
the rise of the amplitude of the XRD peak corresponding to the perovskite
(Figure c), evidencing
the formation of CH3NH3PbI3 as more
crystals contribute to Bragg diffraction. Also during this interval
the angular position, as seen in Figure d (black dots), and width (not shown) of
the XRD peak do not vary. This data indicates that stage (i) corresponds
to the nucleation of perovskite crystallites during the annealing
process.If we consider now the PL decay dynamics (Figure c) we see how during
stage (ii) a rapid increase
in the decay rate takes place. This is accompanied by a decrease in
the PL intensity. These changes point to a decrease in the quantum
yield (QY) of the material, likely related to the presence of nonradiative
recombination paths associated with crystalline defects. This drop
in the QY coincides with the vanishing of the XRD intensity of the
PbI2-related precursor (Figure c) which seems to be acting as a “passivating”
agent of the formed crystallites. If one considers the angular position
of the precursor XRD peak (red dots in Figure d), the drop of its intensity is accompanied
by a shift to larger angles closer to the value expected for pure
PbI2.[29] A plausible explanation
for this behavior is illustrated in Figure , where a schematic description of the crystal
growth process is provided along with the concomitant changes in the
precursor and perovskite structures.
Figure 3
Schematic representation
of the CH3NH3PbI3 formation during
the annealing process. (a,b) Perovskite
crystallites (gray regions) form in a medium comprising a PbI2-related precursor (yellow region). (c) All crystallites form
at the expense of the precursor. (d,e) Crystal growth takes place
as different crystallites coalesce. Insets show photographs of the
samples at different stages of the annealing process: 5, 10, 20, 40,
and 90 min.
The perovskite crystallites
form in the presence of a precursor
whose nature could be PbI2 planes intercalated with DMF
as well as MAI molecules, which separate the crystallographic planes
of the inorganic material (Figure a,b).[30] As nucleation proceeds,
new perovskite crystallites form and the intercalated DMF molecules
evaporate, causing the PbI2 planes to become closer together,
this being at the origin of the narrower interplanar spacing revealed
in Figure d (red dots).
At a certain point, corresponding to the stage (ii), all crystallites
are formed at the expense of the precursor. As it disappears, the
newly formed grain boundaries (Figure c) introduce carrier traps that act as nonradiative
decay paths that yield the sudden drop of photoemission efficiency
observed (Figure b).
This time interval corresponds to the early stages of the annealing
process for which previous work has reported the existence of intermediate
precursor species.[12,17,19,21,22]As we
enter the third regime (iii) the PL decay rate monotonically
decreases until it reaches the constant value characteristic of region
(iv). This is accompanied by a number of changes in some of the other
magnitudes we have monitored. As the amplitude of the XRD peak associated
with the crystalline CH3NH3PbI3 remains
constant we assume that the total amount of perovskite does not change.
At this point, crystal growth of large domains at the expense of smaller
crystallites is probably taking over (Figure d,e). This is in agreement with the fact
that the PL intensity further increases (see Figure b), as larger crystallites present a smaller
density of surface defects that are expected to reduce the QY of the
material. The hypothesis of crystal growth is further supported by
a red shift of the PL peak (Figure a) and a decrease in the decay dynamics. This behavior
has been previously observed by D’Innocenzo and coworkers[31] as a signature of increasing perovskite crystal
size. In that work, the origin of this behavior was attributed to
the release of strain present in the crystalline lattice as a consequence
of the distortion of the Pb–I–Pb bond. This is in agreement
with the monotonic enlargement of the interplanar spacing revealed
by the change in the position of the XRD peak associated with the
CH3NH3PbI3 (see black dots in Figure d) during this third
time interval. Indeed, a difference in the XRD peak position of similar
magnitude has been observed when comparing CH3NH3PbI3 grown on a flat substrate and in a mesostructure,
the latter constraining the space for crystal growth.[23]According to this picture the annealing process necessary
for the
formation of CH3NH3PbI3 upon spin-coating
consists of four different regimes. These comprise the nucleation
of small crystallites (i), a transitional stage during which a large
number of grain boundaries are formed as precursors vanish (ii), an
actual crystal growth period where different crystals coalesce (iii),
and a final stage (iv) where the material is eventually formed. Furthermore,
this whole picture can be accessed only through the combined use of
in situ XRD and photophysical measurements as certain aspects of the
structural changes revealed by the former can be interpreted only
through information contained in the latter.Schematic representation
of the CH3NH3PbI3 formation during
the annealing process. (a,b) Perovskite
crystallites (gray regions) form in a medium comprising a PbI2-related precursor (yellow region). (c) All crystallites form
at the expense of the precursor. (d,e) Crystal growth takes place
as different crystallites coalesce. Insets show photographs of the
samples at different stages of the annealing process: 5, 10, 20, 40,
and 90 min.At this point we note
that the photophysics of the samples at the
end of the annealing process differ from those of a sample left to
cool under ambient conditions for a few hours. In particular, the
PL undergoes a slight red shift of ca. 15 nm (see Figure S4), similar to that recently reported as CH3NH3PbI3 films were heated and ascribed to the
phase change from cubic to tetragonal expected for this material at
42–57 °C.[32] As the annealing
process takes place well above such temperature, the phase of the
as-prepared films is then expected to be cubic, changing to tetragonal
as the sample cools. As a matter of fact, XRD collected at different
temperatures below the annealing one (see Figure ) show a shift to higher angles of the diffraction
peak at ∼14°. A change of similar magnitude (0.05°)
is expected to take place as one considers Bragg diffraction from
the (100) planes of the cubic phase and from the (110) planes of the
tetragonal phase. This point is further supported by the fact that
the corresponding second-order diffraction (around 28°) shifts
to larger angles and splits into two, as expected from the (200) diffraction
of the cubic phase and the (004) and (220) of the tetragonal phase.[27] Finally, as the sample cools from the annealing
temperature, the decay rate is reduced by nearly one order of magnitude.
Such change is probably due to the fact that the crystallization of
the sample continues once the annealing process is interrupted, albeit
at a slower pace, something that has been recently observed by Yamada
and coworkers.[33]
Figure 4
XRD data collected as
a CH3NH3PbI3 film was gradually cooled
from 100 (i.e., the annealing temperature)
to 40 °C. Graphs (a) and (b) correspond to angular ranges where
characteristic diffraction peaks are expected for the cubic and tetragonal
phases of the perovskite material. Full circles correspond to experimental
data and lines are fits to a Gaussian line shape. Vertical lines highlight
the angular position of the main diffraction peaks at the start and
end temperatures.
XRD data collected as
a CH3NH3PbI3 film was gradually cooled
from 100 (i.e., the annealing temperature)
to 40 °C. Graphs (a) and (b) correspond to angular ranges where
characteristic diffraction peaks are expected for the cubic and tetragonal
phases of the perovskite material. Full circles correspond to experimental
data and lines are fits to a Gaussian line shape. Vertical lines highlight
the angular position of the main diffraction peaks at the start and
end temperatures.
Conclusions
In
summary, we have studied the process of hybrid organic–inorganic
perovskite formation during annealing by simultaneously carrying out
real-time in situ structural and photophysical characterization. The
combination of both types of experiments proves crucial to unveil
different mechanisms taking place during the material formation. These
include fluctuations in the PL QY associated with crystal morphology
changing as precursors disappear or the transition from the as-grown
cubic crystalline phase, generated during the annealing, to the well-known
tetragonal phase achieved by cooling the sample to room temperature.
While the transition from kinetically favorable nucleation to the
thermodynamically stable crystal growth is a complicated process,
from which retrieving information on the different steps is a difficult
task, we believe the present results constitute a step further in
understanding the process of formation of CH3NH3PbI3. Furthermore, we note that while applied for a specific
synthetic route and material, the present study can be generalized
as a tool to explore the processes leading to the formation of any
hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite demanding a post-deposition
(being solution process or vacuum) treatment. A precise knowledge
of all of the intermediate stages could pave the way to a deeper control
of the morphology of the perovskite material and hence of the performance
of the final photovoltaic or light-emitting device.
Authors: Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Young Chan Kim; Woon Seok Yang; Seungchan Ryu; Sang Il Seok Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-07-06 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Julian Burschka; Norman Pellet; Soo-Jin Moon; Robin Humphry-Baker; Peng Gao; Mohammad K Nazeeruddin; Michael Grätzel Journal: Nature Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Miguel Anaya; Juan P Correa-Baena; Gabriel Lozano; Michael Saliba; Pablo Anguita; Bart Roose; Antonio Abate; Ullrich Steiner; Michael Grätzel; Mauricio E Calvo; Anders Hagfeldt; Hernán Míguez Journal: J Mater Chem A Mater Date: 2016-06-29
Authors: Lukas Wagner; Laura E Mundt; Gayathri Mathiazhagan; Markus Mundus; Martin C Schubert; Simone Mastroianni; Uli Würfel; Andreas Hinsch; Stefan W Glunz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.379