D Masud1, M Moustaki2, R Staruch3, B Dheansa4. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: dhalia.masud@gmail.com. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE 1 7EH, UK. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial NHS Trust, London, UK. 4. Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead RH19 3DZ, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Re-excision of incompletely excised basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be unsatisfactory in the absence of residual tumours. Recommended guidelines do suggest re-excision as a treatment modality; however, its value has been questioned due to low or variable residual tumour presence. We analysed the incomplete excision and re-excision rates and the presence of residual tumours over an 18-month period in a single unit. METHOD: Using pathology results and case notes, 2586 primary excisions of BCCs in 1717 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The incomplete excision rate was reported to be 7.1% (184/2586). Excision of a lesion by multiple excision lesion procedure was associated with a higher rate of incomplete excision when compared to single lesion excision procedure (61.5% vs. 38.5%). Of the incompletely excised BCCs, 33.6% (62/184) were re-excised, of which 62.9% (39/62) had residual tumours. Although the figures are small, most anatomical sites examined had a residual tumour presence >50%. CONCLUSION: After evaluating each patient individually, considering the high residual tumour rate, re-excision of an incompletely excised BCC would be a worthwhile procedure.
INTRODUCTION: Re-excision of incompletely excised basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be unsatisfactory in the absence of residual tumours. Recommended guidelines do suggest re-excision as a treatment modality; however, its value has been questioned due to low or variable residual tumour presence. We analysed the incomplete excision and re-excision rates and the presence of residual tumours over an 18-month period in a single unit. METHOD: Using pathology results and case notes, 2586 primary excisions of BCCs in 1717 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The incomplete excision rate was reported to be 7.1% (184/2586). Excision of a lesion by multiple excision lesion procedure was associated with a higher rate of incomplete excision when compared to single lesion excision procedure (61.5% vs. 38.5%). Of the incompletely excised BCCs, 33.6% (62/184) were re-excised, of which 62.9% (39/62) had residual tumours. Although the figures are small, most anatomical sites examined had a residual tumour presence >50%. CONCLUSION: After evaluating each patient individually, considering the high residual tumour rate, re-excision of an incompletely excised BCC would be a worthwhile procedure.