Literature DB >> 26948856

Buprenorphine + naloxone plus naltrexone for the treatment of cocaine dependence: the Cocaine Use Reduction with Buprenorphine (CURB) study.

Walter Ling1, Maureen P Hillhouse1, Andrew J Saxon2, Larissa J Mooney1, Christie M Thomas1, Alfonso Ang1, Abigail G Matthews3, Albert Hasson1, Jeffrey Annon1, Steve Sparenborg4, David S Liu4, Jennifer McCormack3, Sarah Church5, William Swafford6, Karen Drexler7, Carolyn Schuman8, Stephen Ross9, Katharina Wiest10, P Todd Korthuis11, William Lawson12, Gregory S Brigham13, Patricia C Knox14, Michael Dawes15, John Rotrosen16.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the safety and effectiveness of buprenorphine + naloxone sublingual tablets (BUP, as Suboxone(®) ) provided after administration of extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX, as Vivitrol(®) ) to reduce cocaine use in participants who met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence and past or current opioid dependence or abuse.
METHODS: This multi-centered, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted under the auspices of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, randomly assigned 302 participants at sites in California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, New York and Washington DC, USA to one of three conditions provided with XR-NTX: 4 mg/day BUP (BUP4, n = 100), 16 mg/day BUP (BUP16, n = 100, or no buprenorphine (placebo; PLB, n = 102). Participants received pharmacotherapy for 8 weeks, with three clinic visits per week. Cognitive behavioral therapy was provided weekly. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 and 3 months post-intervention. The planned primary outcome was urine drug screen (UDS)-corrected, self-reported cocaine use during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Planned secondary analyses assessed cocaine use by UDS, medication adherence, retention and adverse events.
RESULTS: No group differences were found between groups for the primary outcome (BUP4 versus PLB, P = 0.262; BUP16 versus PLB, P = 0.185). Longitudinal analysis of UDS data during the evaluation period using generalized linear mixed equations found a statistically significant difference between BUP16 and PLB [P = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) = 1.71] but not for BUP4 (P = 0.105, OR = 1.05). No secondary outcome differences across groups were found for adherence, retention or adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine + naloxone, used in combination with naltrexone, may be associated with reductions in cocaine use among people who meet DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence and past or current opioid dependence or abuse.
© 2016 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buprenorphine + naloxone; cocaine use disorder; double-blind; multi-site trial; naltrexone; pharmacotherapy; placebo-controlled; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948856      PMCID: PMC4940267          DOI: 10.1111/add.13375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  21 in total

1.  Modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine by buprenorphine.

Authors:  J.B. Kamien; R.D. Spealman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine by mu and kappa opioids.

Authors:  R D Spealman; J Bergman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  An open-label study of a functional opioid kappa antagonist in the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  R B Rothman; D A Gorelick; S J Heishman; P R Eichmiller; B H Hill; J Norbeck; J G Liberto
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2000-04

4.  Opioid peptide receptor studies. 12. Buprenorphine is a potent and selective mu/kappa antagonist in the [35S]-GTP-gamma-S functional binding assay.

Authors:  D V Romero; J S Partilla; Q X Zheng; S O Heyliger; Q Ni; K C Rice; J Lai; R B Rothman
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 5.  A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.

Authors:  R A Wise; M A Bozarth
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Power of automated algorithms for combining time-line follow-back and urine drug screening test results in stimulant-abuse clinical trials.

Authors:  Neal L Oden; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Paul G Wakim; Madhukar H Trivedi; Eugene Somoza; Daniel Lewis
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.829

7.  Naltrexone and buprenorphine combination in the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  G Gerra; A Fantoma; A Zaimovic
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 4.153

8.  Cocaine use reduction with buprenorphine (CURB): rationale, design, and methodology.

Authors:  Larissa J Mooney; Suzanne Nielsen; Andrew Saxon; Maureen Hillhouse; Christie Thomas; Albert Hasson; Don Stablein; Jennifer McCormack; Robert Lindblad; Walter Ling
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Behavioral and neurochemical interactions between cocaine and buprenorphine: implications for the pharmacotherapy of cocaine abuse.

Authors:  E E Brown; J M Finlay; J T Wong; G Damsma; H C Fibiger
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Naltrexone-buprenorphine interactions: effects on cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  N K Mello; S E Lukas; J H Mendelson; J Drieze
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Unpredictability as a modulator of drug self-administration: Relevance for substance-use disorders.

Authors:  Sally L Huskinson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Modulation of drug choice by extended drug access and withdrawal in rhesus monkeys: Implications for negative reinforcement as a driver of addiction and target for medications development.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  The Rise and Fall of Kappa-Opioid Receptors in Drug Abuse Research.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2020

Review 4.  Utility of Nonhuman Primates in Substance Use Disorders Research.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; Paul W Czoty; Sidney S Negus
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 5.  Insights from Preclinical Choice Models on Treating Drug Addiction.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Pharmacotherapy for Cocaine Use Disorder-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian Chan; Karli Kondo; Michele Freeman; Chelsea Ayers; Jessica Montgomery; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Translational value of non-human primates in opioid research.

Authors:  Huiping Ding; Mei-Chuan Ko
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist, CERC-501, in a human laboratory model of smoking behavior.

Authors:  Jermaine D Jones; Shanna Babalonis; Ronald Marcus; Bradley Vince; Debra Kelsh; Michelle R Lofwall; Heather Fraser; Blake Paterson; Suky Martinez; Diana M Martinez; Edward V Nunes; Sharon L Walsh; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.093

Review 9.  Consideration of sex as a biological variable in the translation of pharmacotherapy for stress-associated drug seeking.

Authors:  Erin L Martin; Elizabeth M Doncheck; Carmela M Reichel; Aimee L McRae-Clark
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2021-07-10

Review 10.  Can pharmacotherapy improve treatment outcomes in people with co-occurring major depressive and cocaine use disorders?

Authors:  Gustavo A Angarita; Hasti Hadizadeh; Ignacio Cerdena; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.