Literature DB >> 26948789

In vitro optical quality comparison of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 progressive multifocal intraocular lens.

Alberto Domínguez-Vicent1, Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada2, Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco2, Daniel Monsálvez-Romin2, Robert Montés-Micó2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical quality of 3 multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): the Mini Well Ready progressive multifocal aspheric IOL, the AT LISA trifocal diffractive IOL, and the Finevision full diffractive trifocal IOL.
SETTING: University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: An instrument designed for measuring real-time modulation transfer function (MTF) and IOL power was used to measure the optical quality of each IOL for 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm apertures. This instrument measures both sagittal and tangential MTFs. The optical quality of each IOL was evaluated with the MTF, through-focus MTF, defocus tolerance, Strehl ratio MTF, and relative percentage of light in each focus. These metrics were evaluated at best focus for each IOL.
RESULTS: Through-focus graphs corresponding to trifocal IOLs showed 3 mean peaks. Nevertheless, the progressive multifocal aspheric IOL showed 2 main areas, 1 corresponding to distance vision focus and the other including both intermediate and near vision foci.
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in the present study suggest that the progressive multifocal aspheric IOL might be considered for cataract surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any method or material mentioned.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948789     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Repeatability of in-vitro optical quality measurements of intraocular lenses with a deflectometry technique effect of the toricity.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Santiago García-Lázaro; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; José F Alfonso; José J Esteve-Taboada
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Nicole Balducci; Claudio Carbonara; Scipione Rossi; Manuel Altieri; Nicola Frugis; Emilia Zappulla; Roberto Bellucci; Giovanni Alessio
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Analysis and comparison of monofocal, extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lens profiles.

Authors:  Juan J Miret; Vicente J Camps; Celia García; Maria T Caballero; Juan M Gonzalez-Leal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  In Vitro Aberrometric Assessment of a Multifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Extended Depth of Focus IOLs.

Authors:  Vicente J Camps; Angel Tolosa; David P Piñero; Dolores de Fez; María T Caballero; Juan J Miret
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Clinical Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Kyoung Yoon Shin; Dong Hui Lim; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zequan Xu; Danmin Cao; Xu Chen; Song Wu; Xin Wang; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz; Francesca Toto; Andrzej Grzybowski; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.