Literature DB >> 26948764

Silver and gold nanoparticle separation using asymmetrical flow-field flow fractionation: Influence of run conditions and of particle and membrane charges.

Boris Meisterjahn1, Stephan Wagner2, Frank von der Kammer3, Dieter Hennecke4, Thilo Hofmann5.   

Abstract

Flow-Field Flow Fractionation (Flow-FFF), coupled with online detection systems is one of the most promising tools available for the separation and quantification of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in complex matrices. To correctly relate the retention of nanoparticles in the Flow-FFF-channel to the particle size, ideal separation conditions must be met. This requires optimization of the parameters that influence the separation behavior. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically investigate and evaluate the influence of parameters such as the carrier liquid, the cross flow, and the membrane material, on the separation behavior of two metallic ENPs. For this purpose the retention, recovery, and separation efficiency of sterically stabilized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and electrostatically stabilized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), which represent two materials widely used in investigations on environmental fate and ecotoxicology, were investigated against a parameter matrix of three different cross-flow densities, four representative carrier solutions, and two membrane materials. The use of a complex mixture of buffers, ionic and non-ionic surfactants (FL-70 solution) together with a medium cross-flow density provided an acceptable compromise in peak quality and recovery for both types of ENPs. However, these separation conditions do not represent a perfect match for both particle types at the same time (maximized recovery at maximized retention). It could be shown that the behavior of particles within Flow-FFF channels cannot be predicted or explained purely in terms of electrostatic interactions. Particles were irreversibly lost under conditions where the measured zeta potentials suggested that there should have been sufficient electrostatic repulsion to ensure stabilization of the particles in the Flow-FFF channel resulting in good recoveries. The wide variations that we observed in ENP behavior under different conditions, together with the different behavior that has been reported in published literature for the same NPs under similar conditions, indicate a need for improvement in the membrane materials used for Flow-FFF analysis of NPs. This research has shown that careful adjustment of separation conditions can result in acceptable, but not ideal, separation conditions for two fundamentally different stabilized materials, and that it may not be possible to separate a set of different particles under ideal conditions for each particle type. This therefore needs to be taking into account in method development and when interpreting FFF results from complex samples.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow field-flow fractionation; Gold nanoparticles; Method development; Method optimization; Particle-membrane interactions; Silver nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948764     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  7 in total

1.  Enantiomeric separation of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline by capillary electrophoresis using streptomycin-modified gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Chunye Liu; Jingshu Zhang; Xuejiao Zhang; Lingzhi Zhao; Shuang Li
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation as a multifunctional technique for the characterization of polymeric nanocarriers.

Authors:  Federico Quattrini; Germán Berrecoso; José Crecente-Campo; María José Alonso
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Use of flow field-flow fractionation and single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for size determination of selenium nanoparticles in a mixture.

Authors:  Luluil Maknun; Jitapa Sumranjit; Atitaya Siripinyanond
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Zonal rotor centrifugation revisited: new horizons in sorting nanoparticles.

Authors:  Claudia Simone Plüisch; Brigitte Bössenecker; Lukas Dobler; Alexander Wittemann
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  Insights on the Dynamics and Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Environmental Matrices.

Authors:  T Devasena; B Iffath; R Renjith Kumar; Natarajan Muninathan; Kuppusamy Baskaran; T Srinivasan; Shani T John
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.724

6.  Impact of Ionic Strength of Carrier Liquid on Recovery in Flow Field-Flow Fractionation.

Authors:  Tomasz Kowalkowski; Mateusz Sugajski; Bogusław Buszewski
Journal:  Chromatographia       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.044

7.  Aqueous Dilution of Noble NPs Bulk Dispersions: Modeling Instability due to Dissolution by AF4 and Stablishing Considerations for Plasmonic Assays.

Authors:  Lorenzo Sanjuan-Navarro; Aaron Boughbina-Portolés; Yolanda Moliner-Martínez; Pilar Campíns-Falcó
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.076

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.